All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Cc: CoolCold <coolthecold@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network-based RAID6
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:35:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D933188.30003@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110330144944.3c87185c@natsu>

Roman Mamedov put forth on 3/30/2011 3:49 AM:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:20:41 +0400
> CoolCold <coolthecold@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Looking on your host I think you speak russian, so may be this will be
>> somehow helpful for you
>> http://community.livejournal.com/ru_root/2216389.html
> 
> Thanks -- I have looked through the websites of some distributed filesystems
> (Ceph, GlusterFS, MooseFS etc) and checked this thread too, but from what I
> could find, all filesystems I read about so far are at most capable of RAID0 or
> RAID1-like modes, where fault-tolerance is either not provided, or achieved
> only by "all data is replicated across N nodes", which of course divides the
> total usable space by N. I haven't found any FS which would do block-level
> replication relying not on dumb copies, but on RAID5/6-like parity algorithms
> for fault-tolerance. Maybe I missed something?

You likely won't find any distributed filesystem that performs block
level replication over the network, at least not a FOSS one.  These are
filesystems, mind you, not distributed block device drivers.  If they
perform any replication to afford a level of fault tolerance, it will be
at the file level, not the block level.

If you want true block level replication over a network, look into DRBD.
 However, it is also limited to mirroring.

-- 
Stan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-30 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-30  7:11 Network-based RAID6 Roman Mamedov
2011-03-30  7:20 ` CoolCold
2011-03-30  8:49   ` Roman Mamedov
2011-03-30 13:35     ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2011-03-30 14:24       ` Roberto Spadim
2011-03-30 14:43         ` Miles Fidelman
2011-03-30 14:58           ` Roberto Spadim
2011-03-30 17:50       ` Roman Mamedov
2011-03-30 18:17         ` Roberto Spadim
2011-03-31  4:56         ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-03-31  5:16           ` Roman Mamedov
2011-03-31  5:35             ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-03-31  7:59             ` hansbkk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D933188.30003@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=coolthecold@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.