Hi Guillaume,

>> The logic for sending a guard timeout, +++, guard timeout should really
>> belong in GAtChat, otherwise every single client has to repeat the same
>> state machine.
> 
> I can implement a g_at_chat_send_escape_sequence() to manage:
> <pause> --> +++ <pause> timing
> 
> I would still write directly on at_chat GAtIO because using
> at_chat_send_common() would add a '\r' that would cancel the suspend
> data call.
> 

Yes, of course.

Regards,
-Denis