From: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: Gregory Farnum <gregory.farnum@dreamhost.com>,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cosd multi-second stalls cause "wrongly marked me down"
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:10:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D94B573.7070505@sandia.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D94B333.4060700@sandia.gov>
Jim Schutt wrote:
> Sage Weil wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Jim Schutt wrote:
>>>> I was actually suggesting we try to make it core dump inside the
>>>> "delete
>>>> this" and watching for a stall in progress and then sending SIGABRT
>>>> to dump
>>>> core in the act. That way we verify it really is in the allocator (and
>>>> maybe even see where). That's a bit harder to set up, though!
>>> Right, I couldn't think of how to automate that stall detection
>>> during the stall, rather than after. At least, I couldn't
>>> think of how to do it without incurring possibly excessive
>>> overhead, say by starting a timer on every "delete this".
>>
>> Yeah. I wonder if dumping core on a cosd right when it gets marked
>> down would do the trick? That should catch it ~20 seconds or whatever
>> in the stall. By watching for the "osdfoo marked down" messages from
>> ceph -w?
>
> What about making Cond::Wait() use pthread_cond_timedwait()
> with a suitable timeout value, say 10 seconds, and asserting
> on timeout? Do you think there would be many legitimate 10
> second delays in OSD processing?
>
Or, I could make a Cond::WaitIntervalOrAbort(), and
use it just on the pipe lock, since that's the source
of the trouble. Sound useful?
-- Jim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-31 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 21:25 cosd multi-second stalls cause "wrongly marked me down" Jim Schutt
2011-02-16 21:37 ` Wido den Hollander
2011-02-16 21:51 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-16 21:40 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-02-16 21:50 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-17 0:50 ` Sage Weil
2011-02-17 0:54 ` Sage Weil
2011-02-17 15:46 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-17 16:11 ` Sage Weil
2011-02-17 23:31 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-18 7:13 ` Sage Weil
2011-02-18 17:04 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-18 17:15 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-02-18 18:41 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-18 19:07 ` Colin McCabe
2011-02-18 20:48 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-18 20:58 ` Sage Weil
2011-02-18 21:09 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-09 16:02 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-09 17:07 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-03-09 18:36 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-09 19:37 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-03-10 23:09 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-10 23:21 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-10 23:32 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-10 23:40 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-11 14:51 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 18:26 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 18:37 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 18:37 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-11 18:51 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 19:09 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-03-11 19:13 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-03-11 19:17 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-03-11 19:16 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 21:13 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 21:37 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-11 22:21 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 22:26 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-11 22:45 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-11 23:29 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-30 21:26 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-30 21:55 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-31 14:16 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-31 16:25 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-31 17:00 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-31 17:10 ` Jim Schutt [this message]
2011-03-31 17:24 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-31 18:08 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-31 18:41 ` Sage Weil
2011-04-01 22:38 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-23 17:52 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-23 18:12 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-02-23 18:54 ` Sage Weil
2011-02-23 19:12 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-02-23 19:23 ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-23 20:27 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-03-02 0:53 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-02 15:21 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-02 17:10 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-02 20:54 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-02 21:45 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-02 21:59 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-02 22:57 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-02 23:20 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-03-02 23:25 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-02 23:33 ` Gregory Farnum
2011-03-03 2:26 ` Colin McCabe
2011-03-03 20:03 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 20:47 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 20:55 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-03-03 21:45 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 22:22 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-03 22:34 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 21:53 ` Colin McCabe
2011-03-03 23:06 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 23:30 ` Colin McCabe
2011-03-03 23:37 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 5:03 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-03 16:35 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 17:28 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 18:04 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-03 18:42 ` Jim Schutt
2011-03-03 18:51 ` Sage Weil
2011-03-03 19:39 ` Jim Schutt
2011-04-08 16:23 ` Jim Schutt
2011-04-08 20:50 ` Sage Weil
2011-04-08 22:11 ` Jim Schutt
2011-04-08 23:10 ` Colin McCabe
2011-04-11 14:41 ` Jim Schutt
2011-04-11 16:25 ` Sage Weil
2011-04-11 20:14 ` Jim Schutt
2011-04-11 21:18 ` Jim Schutt
2011-04-11 23:23 ` Sage Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D94B573.7070505@sandia.gov \
--to=jaschut@sandia.gov \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.farnum@dreamhost.com \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.