From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4D95B8E3.601@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:37:07 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1301412534.2109.24.camel@domain.hid> <4D922EF5.8020808@domain.hid> <1301426227.2109.35.camel@domain.hid> <4D9230C5.7050007@domain.hid> <1301426830.2109.41.camel@domain.hid> <4D923306.60409@domain.hid> <1301461081.2092.14.camel@domain.hid> <1301472945.2092.21.camel@domain.hid> <4D948F87.9010109@domain.hid> <4D9494B6.6040304@domain.hid> <1301656855.2155.232.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1301656855.2155.232.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Priority coupling broken? List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Philippe Gerum wrote: > (*) Unless I find a way to direct the linux scheduler to the "right" > task in the migration case, but so far, I found none (none that would be > sane, I mean). In Henri particular case. Maybe there would be a way to call wake_up_process first, then look into the (Linux) scheduler state, see if a reschedule is pending. If a reschedule is pending, do not clear the boost and let do_schedule_event handle the situation? Otherwise, clear the boost. Or maybe that fits into the "insane" category? -- Gilles.