All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@gmail.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
	Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@wdc.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: breaking ext4 to test recovery
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:52:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D95F4AD.2090804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1104011724140.3151@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>

On 04/01/2011 11:26 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> On 3/31/11 5:21 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>
>>> We have a kernel patch "dev_read_only" that we use with Lustre to
>>> disable writes to the block device while the device is in use.  This
>>> allows simulating crashes at arbitrary points in the code or test
>>> scripts.  It was based on Andrew Morton's test harness that he used
>>> for ext3 recovery testing back when it was being ported to the 2.4
>>> kernel.
>>>
>>> http://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=lustre/kernel_patches/patches/dev_read_only-2.6.32-rhel6.patch;hb=HEAD
>>>
>>>   The best part of this patch is that it works with any block device,
>>> can simulate power failure w/o any need for automated power control,
>>> and once the block device is unused (all buffers and references
>>> dropped) it can be re-activated safely.
>> It won't simulate a lost write cache though, will it?
> That's a very good question, I would like to know if there is any way at
> all to force the device to drop the write cache. That would really help
> the power failure testing filesystems.
>
> -Lukas
>

Write cache behavior can be really mysterious. Small writes (say single 4K 
blocks) might stay in cache and not get written for a very long time while 
large, streaming writes might bypass the write cache entirely.

It would be neat to be able to simulate these odd things for failure testing :)

Ric


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-01 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-29  2:45 breaking ext4 to test recovery Daniel Taylor
2011-03-29  3:10 ` Tao Ma
2011-03-29 13:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-03-29 14:33   ` Rogier Wolff
2011-03-29 17:33     ` Greg Freemyer
2011-03-29 22:26       ` Daniel Taylor
2011-03-29 22:33         ` Eric Sandeen
2011-03-31 22:11     ` Andreas Dilger
2011-03-31 22:22       ` Andreas Dilger
2011-03-31 22:21   ` Andreas Dilger
2011-03-31 22:44     ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-01 15:26       ` Lukas Czerner
2011-04-01 15:52         ` Ric Wheeler [this message]
2011-04-02  2:15       ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-02 12:38         ` Ric Wheeler
2011-04-02 18:50           ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-03  2:37           ` Tao Ma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D95F4AD.2090804@gmail.com \
    --to=ricwheeler@gmail.com \
    --cc=Daniel.Taylor@wdc.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.