From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Q70v3-0005CG-57 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 03:43:21 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40062 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q70uz-00057D-Bs for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 03:43:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q70uy-0001aL-8G for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 03:43:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:65504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q70ux-0001Zp-V4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 03:43:16 -0400 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so83535wwb.30 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:43:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=atGvqNmKy2i9nLysKwHeAjhzpzlkHcdCaaVSNRyzNaU=; b=AW+NvZ/yyyE1mKdoyB0V1Otv+4Yaf7/FYSG7JF3378lrv5rvrGuZJXlNqlF/9/4tpo 4JNqhrfXTQfRRt9Ta37y9hrWl+U7HRc88+cVfHAWelZw/phDrYYCRKVWB9AMmHIJfTFO 4k6VczJ8Ah3g+f6KFPI+mPweZg5F4A3IYLOY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CCNsqRQs96dkSz/kL8CR2PEZR8yHphF4LenEXJDiwVHx+wU/3IByZDpQ5BwKv643cm 4sgDqppv83Lolw6cBx01UkWyE7hvTED9vMOkPFCxfTYrHPUt//fFxzjGCXbb6eJ9PmoT IdHmjb5RNCMFRHcbUbzHXuVs6QdR38AdJIfKQ= Received: by 10.227.207.196 with SMTP id fz4mr8036040wbb.42.1301989394408; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (public-docking-hg-6-208.ethz.ch [129.132.216.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y12sm3364334wby.59.2011.04.05.00.43.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D9AC80F.8060306@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:43:11 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110402 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB References: <202218.1487.qm@web120001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <620C372B-B2A3-40DE-BA70-2475DF052A89@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 Subject: Re: Grub2 EFI: Image loading from USB takes too long X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:43:18 -0000 On 05.04.2011 09:17, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > In a crude benchmarking using s top watch, the > time between selection of menuentry to seeing the kernel boot messages > is approx 4 minutes (236 seconds) measured using a stop watch. I have > not yet tested with an updated ovmf in qemu or in duet. You push for a potentially harming change, yet when asked to try with smaller numbers to see which value is optimal/required suddenly you stop answering. -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko