From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] btrfs: Factor out enumeration of chunks to a separate function
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:00:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9DFBC6.5010505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302195975-3088-4-git-send-email-hugo@carfax.org.uk>
On 04/07/2011 01:06 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> The main balance function has two loops which are functionally
> identical in their looping mechanism, but which perform a different
> operation on the chunks they loop over. To avoid repeating code more
> than necessary, factor this loop out into a separate iterator function
> which takes a function parameter for the action to be performed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills<hugo@carfax.org.uk>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 5378b94..ffba817 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -2029,6 +2029,97 @@ static u64 div_factor(u64 num, int factor)
> return num;
> }
>
> +/* Define a type, and two functions which can be used for the two
> + * phases of the balance operation: one for counting chunks, and one
> + * for actually moving them. */
> +typedef void (*balance_iterator_function)(struct btrfs_root *,
> + struct btrfs_balance_info *,
> + struct btrfs_path *,
> + struct btrfs_key *);
> +
> +void balance_count_chunks(struct btrfs_root *chunk_root,
> + struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info,
> + struct btrfs_path *path,
> + struct btrfs_key *key)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + bal_info->expected++;
> + spin_unlock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> +}
> +
> +void balance_move_chunks(struct btrfs_root *chunk_root,
> + struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info,
> + struct btrfs_path *path,
> + struct btrfs_key *key)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(chunk_root,
> + chunk_root->root_key.objectid,
> + key->objectid,
> + key->offset);
> + BUG_ON(ret&& ret != -ENOSPC);
> + spin_lock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + bal_info->completed++;
> + spin_unlock(&chunk_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: balance: %llu/%llu block groups completed\n",
> + bal_info->completed, bal_info->expected);
> +}
> +
> +/* Iterate through all chunks, performing some function on each one. */
> +int balance_iterate_chunks(struct btrfs_root *chunk_root,
> + struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info,
> + balance_iterator_function fn)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct btrfs_path *path;
> + struct btrfs_key key;
> + struct btrfs_key found_key;
> +
> + path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> + if (!path)
> + return -ENOSPC;
Return ENOMEM, we're out of memory not space.
> +
> + key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
> + key.offset = (u64)-1;
> + key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
> +
> + while (!bal_info->cancel_pending) {
> + ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, chunk_root,&key, path, 0, 0);
> + if (ret< 0)
> + break;
> + /*
> + * this shouldn't happen, it means the last relocate
> + * failed
> + */
> + if (ret == 0)
> + break;
> +
> + ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, 0,
> + BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0],&found_key,
> + path->slots[0]);
> + if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid)
> + break;
> +
> + /* chunk zero is special */
> + if (found_key.offset == 0)
> + break;
> +
> + /* Call the function to do the work for this chunk */
> + btrfs_release_path(chunk_root, path);
> + fn(chunk_root, bal_info, path,&found_key);
> +
> + key.offset = found_key.offset - 1;
> + }
> +
> + btrfs_free_path(path);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -2036,11 +2127,8 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> struct btrfs_device *device;
> u64 old_size;
> u64 size_to_free;
> - struct btrfs_path *path;
> - struct btrfs_key key;
> struct btrfs_root *chunk_root = dev_root->fs_info->chunk_root;
> struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> - struct btrfs_key found_key;
> struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info;
>
> if (dev_root->fs_info->sb->s_flags& MS_RDONLY)
> @@ -2061,8 +2149,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> }
> spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> dev_root->fs_info->balance_info = bal_info;
> - bal_info->expected = -1; /* One less than actually counted,
> - because chunk 0 is special */
> + bal_info->expected = 0;
> bal_info->completed = 0;
> bal_info->cancel_pending = 0;
> spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> @@ -2091,91 +2178,23 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> }
>
> /* step two, count the chunks */
> - path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> - if (!path) {
> - ret = -ENOSPC;
> - goto error;
> - }
> -
> - key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
> - key.offset = (u64)-1;
> - key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
> -
> - ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, chunk_root,&key, path, 0, 0);
> - if (ret<= 0) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: Failed to find the last chunk.\n");
> - BUG();
> - }
> -
> - while (1) {
> - ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, 0,
> - BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY);
> - if (ret)
> - break;
> -
> - spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> - bal_info->expected++;
> - spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> - }
> -
> - btrfs_free_path(path);
> - path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> - if (!path) {
> - ret = -ENOSPC;
> + ret = balance_iterate_chunks(chunk_root, bal_info,
> + balance_count_chunks);
> + if (ret)
> goto error;
> - }
>
> /* step three, relocate all the chunks */
> - key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
> - key.offset = (u64)-1;
> - key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
> -
> - while (!bal_info->cancel_pending) {
> - ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, chunk_root,&key, path, 0, 0);
> - if (ret< 0)
> - goto error;
> -
> - /*
> - * this shouldn't happen, it means the last relocate
> - * failed
> - */
> - if (ret == 0)
> - break;
> -
> - ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, 0,
> - BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY);
> - if (ret)
> - break;
> -
> - btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0],&found_key,
> - path->slots[0]);
> - if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid)
> - break;
> -
> - /* chunk zero is special */
> - if (found_key.offset == 0)
> - break;
> + ret = balance_iterate_chunks(chunk_root, bal_info,
> + balance_move_chunks);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error;
>
> - btrfs_release_path(chunk_root, path);
> - ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(chunk_root,
> - chunk_root->root_key.objectid,
> - found_key.objectid,
> - found_key.offset);
> - BUG_ON(ret&& ret != -ENOSPC);
> - key.offset = found_key.offset - 1;
> - spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> - bal_info->completed++;
> - spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> - printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: balance: %llu/%llu block groups completed\n",
> - bal_info->completed, bal_info->expected);
> - }
> ret = 0;
> if (bal_info->cancel_pending) {
> printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: balance cancelled\n");
> ret = -EINTR;
> }
> error:
> - btrfs_free_path(path);
> spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> kfree(dev_root->fs_info->balance_info);
> dev_root->fs_info->balance_info = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 17:06 [PATCH v4 0/8] Balance management Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] btrfs: Balance progress monitoring Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:26 ` Josef Bacik
2011-04-08 2:26 ` Li Zefan
2011-04-08 13:43 ` Hugo Mills
2011-04-08 13:12 ` David Sterba
2011-04-08 16:00 ` David Sterba
2011-04-08 13:37 ` David Sterba
2011-04-08 14:07 ` Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] btrfs: Cancel filesystem balance Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] btrfs: Factor out enumeration of chunks to a separate function Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 18:00 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] btrfs: Implement filtered balance ioctl Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] btrfs: Balance filter for device ID Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] btrfs: Balance filter for virtual address ranges Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] btrfs: Replication-type information Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] btrfs: Balance filter for physical device address Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9DFBC6.5010505@redhat.com \
--to=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.