From: Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden <groen692@grosc.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Cc: "Christoph.Egger@amd.com" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [Xen-users] Nested Virtualisation question
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 15:32:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA06008.2060700@grosc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C9C5FE61.2C58A%keir@xen.org>
I'm now testing on a intel q9450, which does not seem to have this. I
will move my testing to a intel e5645 which seems to have this capability.
Question then is, when will the intel support be implemented? is there
commitment from some developer? is there a roadmap planned. in short
what is the story here.
mfg,
Jeroen
Op 9-4-2011 13:15, Keir Fraser schreef:
> On 09/04/2011 11:18, "Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden"
> <groen692@grosc.com> wrote:
>
>> The HAP is default set to one, I check this also with a dry run.
>> Please confirm all this support just amd, because I only have Intel
>> overhere.
> Well, quite apart from being AMD only right now (Intel patches have been
> posted in the past, but they're not in tree yet, and I very much doubt old
> patches would directly apply to our current development tree), I'm also
> pretty sure that your machine doesn't support Intel EPT -- if the processor
> can't support HAP then we silently discard that configuration request when
> creating a domain. That's why you get error 22 (EINVAL). But even if you did
> have Intel EPT, because Intel's nested virt patches aren't in tree yet you'd
> just get error 95 (EOPNOTSUPP) instead!
>
> By the way you can tell if your system supports EPT by grepping in 'xm
> dmesg' output (i.e., Xen's boot log) for a line stating "Extended Page
> Tables (EPT)".
>
> -- Keir
>
>> mfg,
>> Jeroen
>>
>> Op 9-4-2011 8:22, Keir Fraser schreef:
>>> On 09/04/2011 06:07, "Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden"
>>> <groen692@grosc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The result with c/s23197
>>>>
>>>> Regular domain now start, en stop normaly, (xl seems to have a problem
>>>> though, after domain closes a domain null remains in de xl list/ xmdoe
>>>> not have this.)
>>>> for nestedVM I added the "nestedhvm=1" in the config file of the domain.
>>>> but the domain does not start because of "invalid argument"
>>> NestedHVM currently requires you to be using an AMD processor with hardware
>>> nested paging (known as HAP by Xen). Most likely you need to add hap=1 to
>>> your config file (and hope your processor supports it).
>>>
>>> -- Keir
>>>
>>>> +++++++++ beging console
>>>> hydra:/etc/xen/vm # xm create groscNestedVM
>>>> Using config file "./groscNestedVM".
>>>> Error: (22, 'Invalid argument')
>>>> +++++++++ end console
>>>>
>>>> +++++++++ begin xend.log
>>>> hydra:/etc/xen/vm # tail /var/log/xen/xend.log
>>>> dominfo = XendDomainInfo.create(config)
>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py",
>>>> line 106, in create
>>>> vm.start()
>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py",
>>>> line 473, in start
>>>> XendTask.log_progress(0, 30, self._constructDomain)
>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xen/xend/XendTask.py", line
>>>> 209, in log_progress
>>>> retval = func(*args, **kwds)
>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py",
>>>> line 2598, in _constructDomain
>>>> xc.hvm_set_param(self.domid, HVM_PARAM_NESTEDHVM, long(nestedhvm))
>>>> Error: (22, 'Invalid argument')
>>>> +++++++++++ end xend.log
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Op 7-4-2011 12:29, Tim Deegan schreef:
>>>>> At 08:14 +0100 on 07 Apr (1302164093), Keir Fraser wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/04/2011 08:09, "Keir Fraser"<keir.xen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Probably the same as this, happening often in the automated tests:
>>>>>> Likely reason: nestedhvm_vcpu_initialise() being called unconditionally in
>>>>>> hvm_vcpu_initialise() even though nestedhvm has not been configured for
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> domain. This then fails because there is no nestedhvm handler for Intel
>>>>>> yet.
>>>>> This bug should be fixed by 23175:e5a750d1bf9b, arriving at a staging
>>>>> tree near you at any moment.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And beyond that it's most likely an issue of a broken failure path, or a
>>>>>> problem in the HAP code with cleaning up a half-created guest.
>>>>> This one I'll look into now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-09 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D596513.90504@grosc.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTim4d14oK-KOwOG2YZzb-n3jyqj6SttM0xMzxC9a@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4D5A2175.3090309@grosc.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTinuoLdRwVEzWUp3-O5Qtjhs4fW8e2+-RacrNjYu@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4D98D969.3050101@grosc.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=-8XmWcrx_8Q1ai0DgjnUoiKB+ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-04 6:47 ` [Xen-users] Nested Virtualisation question Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
2011-04-04 6:49 ` Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
2011-04-04 9:51 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Tim Deegan
2011-04-04 10:08 ` Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
2011-04-07 5:36 ` Re: [Xen-users] " Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
2011-04-07 7:09 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-07 7:14 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-07 10:29 ` Tim Deegan
2011-04-09 5:07 ` Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
2011-04-09 6:22 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-09 10:18 ` Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
2011-04-09 11:15 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-09 13:32 ` Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden [this message]
2011-04-09 14:31 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-07 9:09 ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-07 9:30 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-07 9:04 ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-07 10:15 ` Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA06008.2060700@grosc.com \
--to=groen692@grosc.com \
--cc=Christoph.Egger@amd.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.