All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: regression - slow git rebase performance with 2.6.39-rcX kernel
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA45B12.2090506@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimJDxZ4qBRNnwE9L=3bfEU0WOhd6A@mail.gmail.com>

On 2011-04-12 15:59, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2011/4/12 Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>:
>> On 2011-04-12 14:51, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [ Fixed your empty CC list. ]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
>>> <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm noticing quite slower speed of my git rebase commands on my git
>>>> tree compared with 2.6.38 kernel.
>>>> I've  T61 with SSD disc drive, ext4 fs, and by default deadline disk
>>>> io scheduler
>>>> The counter showing the number of 'rebased' patches on top of master
>>>> is going much slower.
>>>> When I boot 2.6.38 kernel it's much faster.
>>>>
>>>> Is it a known problem - or do I need to make a bisect ?
>>>
>>> No, I don't think it's a known problem. Git bisect would be helpful,
>>> obviously.
>>
>> Definitely, interesting. Bisect would help. I'll try a similar workload
>> here and see if I see any differences. How big is your rebase, and what
>> are the runtimes (approximately) on .38 vs .39-rc?
>>
> 
> I've made just quick build with the small kernel without debug options
> enable - and the time is then equal with 2.6.38. So the difference is
> probably somewhere in debug build  -  I assume some debug option
> slowed down between 2.6.38 - 2.6.39 significantly.

Good, so it's down to debug. Thanks for testing.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-12 12:45 regression - slow git rebase performance with 2.6.39-rcX kernel Zdenek Kabelac
2011-04-12 12:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-12 13:07   ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:59     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-04-12 14:00       ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DA45B12.2090506@fusionio.com \
    --to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.