From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4DA45E42.5030500@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:14:26 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D9F0679.7080109@domain.hid> <1302268379.2101.35.camel@domain.hid> <4DA30C80.3010107@domain.hid> <1302531493.2054.355.camel@domain.hid> <4DA30E14.6070401@domain.hid> <1302532049.2054.357.camel@domain.hid> <4DA31108.9080000@domain.hid> <1302532753.2054 <4DA314F1.3070504@domain.hid> <4DA31EB6.4040909@domain.hid> <4DA4544F.7020300@domain.hid> <4DA45660.4000003@domain.hid> <4DA45D0F.4090501@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4DA45D0F.4090501@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] kernel threads crash List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jesper Christensen Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" On 2011-04-12 16:09, Jesper Christensen wrote: > Speaking of rtpc, could there be a race condition when using a > rtdm_lock_t to synchronize between a linux thread and a xenomai thread? Without seeing at some code, I can't comment on this meaningfully. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux