From: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: "Maciej Żenczykowski" <zenczykowski@gmail.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance issue due to constant "modprobes"
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:35:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA59881.1050501@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1104131406130.25539@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Hi
> In iptables, the options --enable-static and --enable-shared are
> semantically different from other projects.
Thanks for confirming - iptables also helpfully spells exactly this out
in the INSTALL doc (+1 for open source documentation!!)
>> Additionally, as helpfully pointed out by Jan, a chunk of my problem is
>> my static iptables apparently trying to probe a kernel module which
>> isn't incorporated into my kernel version. I can't immediately see a
>> solution to not uselessly probing for that (without patching iptables)?
>> Any ideas?
>
> I would have said it could be the missing SET module being the cause for
> your modprobe time accumulation, but since you also use iptables-restore
> that possibility, too, is eliminated.
Yes, although these modules are being probed for even on a zero
(missing) input to iptables-restore. However, that seems consistent
with a v1.4.10 iptables --enable-static based binary? Presumably this
just probes everything?
(To be clear my test in my previous email was NOT using your git commit
to delay mod probing)
I will have to retest with your commit and without my hack to see
exactly what is still being probed for
Thanks
Ed W
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-13 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 23:16 Performance issue due to constant "modprobes" Ed W
2011-04-08 0:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-08 17:11 ` Ed W
2011-04-08 0:47 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-08 17:11 ` Ed W
2011-04-08 19:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-08 23:22 ` Ed W
2011-04-08 23:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-09 20:39 ` Ed W
2011-04-09 22:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-12 21:03 ` Ed W
2011-04-12 22:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 11:08 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 9:10 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-13 11:35 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 12:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 12:35 ` Ed W [this message]
2011-04-13 12:45 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-13 16:45 ` Ed W
2011-04-13 19:20 ` Mr Dash Four
2011-04-14 7:07 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-14 7:13 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-14 7:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-04-18 13:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-04-18 16:33 ` Ed W
2011-04-19 1:12 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-19 9:03 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-19 16:10 ` Ed W
2011-04-20 1:26 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-20 6:41 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-04-20 7:31 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2011-04-20 8:54 ` Ed W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA59881.1050501@wildgooses.com \
--to=lists@wildgooses.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zenczykowski@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.