All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nestedhvm: ASID emulation
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:19:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA5BEF4.3060504@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C9CB7A40.16495%keir.xen@gmail.com>

On 04/13/11 17:05, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 13/04/2011 15:26, "Christoph Egger"<Christoph.Egger@amd.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 04/13/11 15:27, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> On 13/04/2011 11:37, "Christoph Egger"<Christoph.Egger@amd.com>   wrote:
>>>
>> We talk about a win of about 1000 cycles per VMRUN and another 1000
>> cycles per VMEXIT emulation.
>>
>> That's a speedup of about 10% for each VMRUN and about 20% for each
>> VMEXIT emulation.
>
> Is this measurable on a macro benchmark?

I measured this with xentrace while l2 guest is booting.

The speedup is noticable on the end-user side just by the feeling on how 
fast the l2 guest reacts on user input.


> I mean this looks like a micro-optimisation on a feature that noone is going
> to use for serious performance work anyway.
>
>> 4. nestedhvm is enabled and we are going to run l2 guest
>>
>> We run the l1 guest in the last call. The asid generation may have
>> changed by then. In this case the current nv_n2asid number is stale
>> and the value of data->next_asid is<= of nv->nv_n2asid.
>
> How do you know for sure that next_asid will be<= nv_n2asid in this case?
> What if other VCPUs have run meanwhile, and next_asid has been incremented
> multiple times until it is greather than nv_n2asid?

In that case  curr->arch.hvm_vcpu.asid_generation is not equal to 
data->core_asid_generation  and a new hw ASID number is assigned
regardless of the values of data->next_asid and nv_n2asid.

Christoph

>
>   -- Keir
>
>> The the value of nv->nv_n2asid is valid if l1 guest doesn't change
>> the virtual asid (= asid number in the virtual vmcb) and
>> data->next_asid is larger than nv->nv_n2asid. In this case
>> just reuse the same hw ASID that has been used from the last
>> VMRUN emulation.
>>
>> 5. nestedhvm is enabled and we are going to run l2 guest again
>>
>> The same hw ASID should be reused unless the generation changed because
>> the nestedp2m got flushed or the vcpu moved to a different physical cpu,
>> for example.
>> But the hw ASID number may never match the hw ASID used to run the l1 guest.
>>
>>
>> In all cases we have to verify that the
>>
>>> I wouldn't bother fixing #2 unless there's a convincing answer for #1.
>>>
>>>    -- Keir
>>
>
>
>


-- 
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85689 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-13 10:37 [PATCH] nestedhvm: ASID emulation Christoph Egger
2011-04-13 13:27 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-13 14:26   ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-13 15:05     ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-13 15:19       ` Christoph Egger [this message]
2011-04-13 16:22         ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14  9:26           ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-14 10:28             ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-14 14:01               ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-14 14:43                 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-15  8:20                   ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-15  9:05                     ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-15  9:08                       ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-15  9:24                         ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-15  9:57                           ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-15 12:53                             ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-15 12:49                               ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-15 13:40                               ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-13 13:51 ` Christoph Egger
2011-04-13 14:48   ` Christoph Egger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-13  8:57 Christoph Egger
2011-04-13  9:18 ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DA5BEF4.3060504@amd.com \
    --to=christoph.egger@amd.com \
    --cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.