From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joanna Rutkowska Subject: Re: Which kernel for dom0 with pv_ops Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:46:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4DA8BCA9.2020807@invisiblethingslab.com> References: <4DA852E0.2080300@mimuw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0165647554==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DA852E0.2080300@mimuw.edu.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Marek Marczykowski Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0165647554== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3BF2EE0B5B2F7C9C3DC242F3" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3BF2EE0B5B2F7C9C3DC242F3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/15/11 16:14, Marek Marczykowski wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm trying to prepare new kernel for Qubes OS. Which version should I > use? The main goal is to use as new as possible kernel (for new hardwar= e > support) and pv_ops. Required functionality: > - dom0 :) > - netback Actually we don't need netback for Dom0. > - netfront > - blkback > - pciback >=20 > Nice to see also pvusb-back. >=20 Generally, we would like to use either 2.6.38 or 2.6.39 with any required patches to bring blk and pci backends. > Same question for domU, but here I suppose that vanilla 2.6.39 will do > the work. Required functionality: > - netfront > - netback (!) > - pcifront > - (optional) pvusb-front >=20 > Is there any git tree containing all of above? Or maybe I should use > some additional patches (from where?)? >=20 > I guess that for dom0 the best choice is Konrad's repo, branch > linux-next, right? But there is no PCI backend driver and maybe more...= >=20 >=20 > For now, I use xen 4.0.1 as stable in Fedora 14. Is newer version > required for some of above to work properly? >=20 Thanks, joanna. --------------enig3BF2EE0B5B2F7C9C3DC242F3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNqLypAAoJEDaIqHeRBUM0hE0H/RXzju6EKn/K8yehi8ystqp/ x3r79O/PtE4LXdA34fLMEqS5YaLde2kCkFIR8HnM7Y4U1Woq/X72jEiz+Hy5651y lCQq+TBcW0dEfx/6Bs5MZJJdh7yTnB7yyoAzPrz4ARe5o3utBAjaSU/HadfE9hH5 daNTreaqOhzPZ1L6PP5qG0S1S1jDh0OpR5Vyl2tC2gaAxdVKBgERIdDsJQCnQPvn ihKQeOv1WB4OGuBnS1G+XUy9zFDhLz0SIE4GEVULvRrPcbearOe7GfbrA7q2Beje 9jj41L2fEa0e8W7vJrSb6Eb4JUUedpjXRusfiMOVYko1XEKm0PIzKIlme6MXmn8= =8O// -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3BF2EE0B5B2F7C9C3DC242F3-- --===============0165647554== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0165647554==--