All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Cc: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:24:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAD9B03.4060709@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DAD9912.6050101@redhat.com>

On 2011-04-19 16:15, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-04-19 08:46, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>>   
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:02:35PM -0400, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>>     
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 06:09:17PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>> On 2011-03-25 09:44, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>>> +        tsc_delta = !vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc ? 0 :
>>>>>>> +                 tsc - vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>> This patch appears to cause troubles to Linux guests on TSC
>>>>>> clocksource
>>>>>> and APIC highres timer. The first boot after qemu start is always
>>>>>> fine,
>>>>>> but after a reboot the guest timer appears to fire incorrectly or
>>>>>> even
>>>>>> not at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was this patch tested with a guest reboot scenario as well? Does it
>>>>>> account for the TSC being reset to 0 on reboot?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>> Hmm, probably the last_guest_tsc is not updated correctly in this
>>>>> scenario. I will have a look tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Joerg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>> To avoid this problem, when the TSC is reset, the overshoot protection
>>>> where last_guest_tsc is used is specifically disabled:
>>>>
>>>>           /* Reset of TSC must disable overshoot protection below */
>>>>           vcpu->arch.hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = 0;
>>>>           vcpu->arch.last_tsc_write = data;
>>>>           vcpu->arch.last_tsc_nsec = ns;
>>>>
>>>> You can probably use the same test - last_guest_tsc is only valid if
>>>> tsc_timestamp above != 0.
>>>>        
>>> Yes, this should also work. But the other way we get rid of
>>> last_host_tsc which is also a good thing :)
>>>      
>> That reminds me: I think we still have the bug that KVM overeagerly
>> declares the host's TSC unstable after resume from S3 because the TSC
>> appears to go backward when KVM checks. Or should this have been fixed
>> now?
>>
>>    
> 
> That should have been fixed... let me check if the patch has made it
> upstream.

I have "Marking TSC unstable due to KVM discovered backwards TSC" in my
recent log after I forgot to kill some guest before suspending the host.
And that was with kvm-kmod/kvm.git head. So I tend to believe that it's
not yet completely fixed...

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-19 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-25  8:44 [PATCH 0/6] TSC scaling support for KVM v3 Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25  8:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: SVM: Implement infrastructure for TSC_RATE_MSR Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25  8:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: X86: Let kvm-clock report the right tsc frequency Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25  8:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc Joerg Roedel
2011-03-27 10:57   ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-27 11:10     ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-16 16:09   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-17 12:06     ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-19  0:02       ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-19  6:46         ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-19  6:49           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-19 14:15             ` Zachary Amsden
2011-04-19 14:24               ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-04-18  8:03     ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-18  9:12       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-18  9:25         ` Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25  8:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: X86: Implement call-back to propagate virtual_tsc_khz Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25  8:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: X86: Delegate tsc-offset calculation to architecture code Joerg Roedel
2011-03-25  8:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: X86: Implement userspace interface to set virtual_tsc_khz Joerg Roedel
2011-03-27 10:58 ` [PATCH 0/6] TSC scaling support for KVM v3 Avi Kivity
2011-04-06  7:33 ` Avi Kivity
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-24  7:40 [PATCH 0/6][RESEND] TSC scaling support for KVM v2 Joerg Roedel
2011-03-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc Joerg Roedel
2011-03-15  9:36 [PATCH 0/6] TSC scaling support for KVM v2 Joerg Roedel
2011-03-15  9:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: X86: Make tsc_delta calculation a function of guest tsc Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DAD9B03.4060709@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.