From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@cdf.toronto.edu>
To: "Mathias Burén" <mathias.buren@gmail.com>
Cc: b2 <b2@playtime.bg>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: debian software raid1
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:03:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DADB24F.2030300@cdf.toronto.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik7iVaUH2bn9spW2gtV-TkjLH2Qag@mail.gmail.com>
Hey guys,
On 04/19/11 08:25, Mathias Burén wrote:
> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/238
>
> Plenty of articles on the net on how to do that.
There is a lot of information, but also, I suspect there is a lot of
disagreement. One thing that I could not find a definitive answer on was
the question of whether or not to mirror swap.
There are articles that propose mirroring partitions independently
(rather than the entire disk), and not mirroring swap, but adding two
swap partitions with equal priority. On the other hand, there are people
who point out that in the event where one of the disks in the mirror
dies, the machine may cease to function, because a part of its "memory"
will have disappeared. However, making swap part of the mirror opens a
whole new can of worms. For instance, could there be a deadlock
possibility (for example after a suspend/resume cycle) where mdadm is
waiting for something which is swapped out onto swap which is mirrored?
It would be nice to have a discussion among people who have experience
with all of this.
Cheers,
Iordan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-19 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-19 12:12 debian software raid1 b2
2011-04-19 12:25 ` Mathias Burén
2011-04-19 16:03 ` Iordan Iordanov [this message]
2011-04-19 21:10 ` Gordon Henderson
2011-04-19 21:33 ` Steven Haigh
2011-04-19 22:01 ` Roberto Spadim
2011-04-19 22:05 ` Mathias Burén
2011-04-19 22:51 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 0:33 ` Joe Landman
2011-04-20 1:12 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 14:59 ` Iordan Iordanov
2011-04-20 14:51 ` Iordan Iordanov
2011-04-21 6:15 ` Luca Berra
2011-04-21 14:50 ` Iordan Iordanov
2011-04-22 5:59 ` Luca Berra
2011-04-22 19:19 ` Iordan Iordanov
2011-04-22 19:28 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-04-23 0:07 ` Iordan Iordanov
2011-04-20 10:28 ` Asdo
2011-04-20 12:40 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-23 8:33 ` Jan Ceuleers
2011-04-22 19:21 ` Iordan Iordanov
2011-04-22 22:12 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-23 0:05 ` Iordan Iordanov
2011-04-23 12:54 ` David Brown
2011-04-23 14:23 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DADB24F.2030300@cdf.toronto.edu \
--to=iordan@cdf.toronto.edu \
--cc=b2@playtime.bg \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.buren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.