From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Treutner Subject: Re: 2.6.38.1 general protection fault Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:28:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4DAEA72A.9080102@scripty.at> References: <4D8C6110.6090204@wpkg.org> <4D8DAE94.7070604@redhat.com> <4D8DC307.7090400@wpkg.org> <4D8F068B.5030209@redhat.com> <4D902997.80004@wpkg.org> <4D9052B7.2070508@redhat.com> <20110328175437.GB12265@random.random> <4D90CD47.7010107@redhat.com> <20110328200401.GC12265@random.random> <4D90EC17.1080805@wpkg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Tomasz Chmielewski Return-path: Received: from grace.univie.ac.at ([131.130.3.115]:38020 "EHLO grace.univie.ac.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752767Ab1DTJrp (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:47:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4D90EC17.1080805@wpkg.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/28/2011 10:14 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > On 28.03.2011 22:04, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > >> Tomasz, how easily can you reproduce? > > Well, this server runs 10 VMs or so, and it happens after 1-2 days of > uptime. > > I reverted now to a 2.6.35.x, as it had enough downtime with 2.6.38 > already ;) so I'd rather not experiment anymore for some time with a > kernel known to cause problems. Tomasz, to which exact kernel version (host+guests) did you switch and is it now stable? thanks, -t