From: Roger Quadros <roger.quadros@nokia.com>
To: ext Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: <gregkh@suse.de>, <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
<m-sonasath@ti.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: composite: Allow function drivers to defer setup responses
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:30:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB03169.5090504@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.vt6vlrdf3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
On 04/19/2011 05:23 PM, ext Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:33:52 +0200, Roger Quadros <roger.quadros@nokia.com> wrote:
>> @@ -895,6 +904,14 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct
>> usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
>> if (w_value && !f->set_alt)
>> break;
>> value = f->set_alt(f, w_index, w_value);
>> + if (value == USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS) {
>> + DBG(cdev,
>> + "%s: interface %d (%s) requested delayed status\n",
>> + __func__, intf, f->name);
>> + cdev->delayed_status++;
>
> Do we need it to be a counter? Won't simple flag do?
Counter because multiple interfaces could return USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS
and we need to know how many of them call usb_composite_setup_continue() before
we actually complete the control transfer.
>
>> + DBG(cdev, "delayed_status count %d\n",
>> + cdev->delayed_status);
>> + }
>> break;
>> case USB_REQ_GET_INTERFACE:
>> if (ctrl->bRequestType != (USB_DIR_IN|USB_RECIP_INTERFACE))
>
>> @@ -1289,3 +1310,41 @@ void usb_composite_unregister(struct
>> usb_composite_driver *driver)
>> return;
>> usb_gadget_unregister_driver(&composite_driver);
>> }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * usb_composite_setup_continue() - Continue the delayed setup transfer
>> + * @cdev: the composite device who's setup transfer was delayed
>> + *
>> + * This function must be called by the USB function driver to continue
>> + * with the setup transfer's data/status phase in case it had requested to
>> + * delay the status phase. A USB function's setup handler (e.g. set_alt())
>> + * can request the composite framework to delay the setup request's status phase
>> + * by returning USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS.
>> + */
>> +void usb_composite_setup_continue(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
>> +{
>> + int value;
>> + struct usb_request *req = cdev->req;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + DBG(cdev, "%s\n", __func__);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cdev->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + if (cdev->delayed_status == 0) {
>> + WARN(cdev, "%s: Unexpected call\n", __func__);
>> +
>> + } else if (--cdev->delayed_status == 0) {
>> + DBG(cdev, "%s: Completing delayed status\n", __func__);
>> + req->length = 0;
>> + req->zero = 1;
>> + value = usb_ep_queue(cdev->gadget->ep0, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + if (value < 0) {
>> + DBG(cdev, "ep_queue --> %d\n", value);
>> + req->status = 0;
>> + composite_setup_complete(cdev->gadget->ep0, req);
>> + }
>> + }Data/status stage.
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdev->lock, flags);
>> +}
>
> It's just my opinion but I dislike how it looks almost identical to the end
> of composite_setup. I would rather make it more general (take value as
> argument for instance) and let composite_setup() call it.
Yes that could be done. I'll try to do so in the next iteration.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/composite.h @@ -37,6 +37,15 @@
>> #include <linux/usb/ch9.h>
>> #include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
>> +/*
>> + * USB function drivers should return USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS if they
>> + * wish to delay the status phase of the setup transfer till they are
>> + * ready. The composite framework will then delay the data/status phase
>> + * of the setup transfer till all the function drivers that requested for
>> + * USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STAUS, invoke usb_composite_setup_continue().
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#define USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS 0x7fff /* Impossibly large value */
>
> I was wondering if we could change it to something like EDELAYED and put it to
> <include/linux/errno.h>. Just thinking, it may be a bad idea.
>
I would not do it.
Thanks for review.
--
regards,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-19 13:33 [PATCH 0/2] usb: gadget: Make mass_storage pass USBCV MSC Compliance tests Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: composite: Allow function drivers to defer setup responses Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 14:14 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-21 13:27 ` Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 14:23 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-21 13:30 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2011-05-09 9:42 ` Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: f_mass_storage: Make us pass USBCV MSC Compliance tests Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 14:33 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-19 20:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] usb: gadget: Make mass_storage " Sonasath, Moiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB03169.5090504@nokia.com \
--to=roger.quadros@nokia.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-sonasath@ti.com \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.