From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libata: ahci_start_engine compliant to AHCI spec Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 03:08:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4DB27AD4.2030403@pobox.com> References: <1303541890-14528-1-git-send-email-jipeng2005@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:37904 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751286Ab1DWHIK (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 03:08:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1303541890-14528-1-git-send-email-jipeng2005@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jian Peng Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/23/2011 02:58 AM, Jian Peng wrote: > At the end of section 10.1 of AHCI spec (rev 1.3), it states > > Software shall not set PxCMD.ST to 1 until it is determined that > a functoinal device is present on the port as determined by > PxTFD.STS.BSY=0, PxTFD.STS.DRQ=0 and PxSSTS.DET=3h > > Even though most AHCI host controller works without this check, > specific controller will fail under this condition. > > Signed-off-by: Jian Peng > --- > drivers/ata/libahci.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c > index 26d4523..83ed544 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c > @@ -539,6 +539,27 @@ void ahci_start_engine(struct ata_port *ap) > { > void __iomem *port_mmio = ahci_port_base(ap); > u32 tmp; > + u8 status; > + > + status = readl(port_mmio + PORT_TFDATA)& 0xFF; > + > + /* > + * At end of section 10.1 of AHCI spec (rev 1.3), it states > + * Software shall not set PxCMD.ST to 1 until it is determined > + * that a functoinal device is present on the port as determined by > + * PxTFD.STS.BSY=0, PxTFD.STS.DRQ=0 and PxSSTS.DET=3h > + * > + * Even though most AHCI host controllers work without this check, > + * specific controller will fail under this condition > + */ > + if (status& (ATA_BUSY | ATA_DRQ)) > + return; > + else { > + ahci_scr_read(&ap->link, SCR_STATUS,&tmp); > + > + if ((tmp& 0xf) != 0x3) > + return; > + } Looks good, I'll get this queued up...