From: William Wagner <will_wagner@carallon.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] barking up a different tree
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:46:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB33A8A.1000609@carallon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8762q4aejn.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
On 23/04/2011 21:38, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Krinke<charles.krinke@gmail.com> writes:
> Charles> Maybe I am barking up the wrong tree.
>
> Charles> Being able to do "make clean" and *not* have to re-compile the
> Charles> uclibc toolchain would get buildroot to an acceptable point
> Charles> for the uclibc part of my project.
>
> Just build it once somewhere (E.G. set BR2_HOST_DIR to /opt/toolchain or
> whatever), and then just configure BR to use it as an external
> toolchain.
Peter,
I know that your solution works and it's what you say to everybody who
asks that question. However I feel it is the worst feature of buildroot
and the things that most often puts people off when I explain it. Why
not change it so that buildroot normally does a build as if to a
different location and then automatically uses that for the actual build
as we clearly have support for copying the correct bits. I can't really
see any disadvantage of this over the current system and it would
finally allow users to get back to a clean target build but still with
the toolchain built. I would attempt this myself to submit as a patch
but I've not had to hack around with the toolchain much, however if
others can give me some pointers I'd happily look at it, otherwise if
someone else tried it I'd certainly test it.
Will
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Wagner will_wagner at carallon.com
Development Manager Office Tel: +44 (0)20 7371 2032
Carallon Ltd, Studio G20, Shepherds Building, Rockley Rd, London W14 0DA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-23 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-23 20:01 [Buildroot] barking up a different tree Charles Krinke
2011-04-23 20:38 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-04-23 20:46 ` William Wagner [this message]
2011-04-23 21:02 ` Charles Krinke
2011-04-25 15:19 ` ANDY KENNEDY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB33A8A.1000609@carallon.com \
--to=will_wagner@carallon.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.