From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, nmi: Move LVT un-masking into irq handlers
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:26:38 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB851CE.7090503@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303900353-10242-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On 04/27/2011 02:32 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> It was noticed that P4 machines were generating double NMIs for each
> perf event. These extra NMIs lead to 'Dazed and confused' messages on
> the screen.
>
> I tracked this down to a P4 quirk that said the overflow bit had to be
> cleared before re-enabling the apic LVT mask. My first attempt was
> to move the un-masking inside the perf nmi handler from before the
> chipset NMI handler to after.
>
> This broke Nehalem boxes that seem to like the unmasking before the
> counters themselves are re-enabled.
>
> In order to keep this change simple for 2.6.39, I decided to just
> simply move the apic LVT un-masking to the beginning of all the
> chipset NMI handlers, with the exception of Pentium4's to fix the
> double NMI issue.
>
> Later on we can move the un-masking to later in the handlers to save
> a number of 'extra' NMIs on those particular chipsets.
>
> I tested this change on a P4 machine, an AMD machine, a Nehalem box,
> and a core2quad box. 'perf top' worked correctly along with various
> other small 'perf record' runs. Anything high stress breaks all the
> machines but that is a different problem.
>
> Thanks to various people for testing different versions of this patch.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> Originally I was going to bundle this with Cyrill's P4 alias patch but that
> may take awhile, so I am posting this stand alone for now. Sorry for the
> delay.
>
Looks good to me, thanks a lot Don! I'll send you updated alternate events
patch.
--
Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 10:32 [PATCH] perf, nmi: Move LVT un-masking into irq handlers Don Zickus
2011-04-27 17:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2011-04-27 18:33 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86, " tip-bot for Don Zickus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-18 16:56 [PATCH] perf, " Don Zickus
2011-04-20 14:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-04-20 14:57 ` Don Zickus
2011-04-20 15:03 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB851CE.7090503@gmail.com \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.