From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] n450: add 2.6.37 kernel recipe and SMP support
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:59:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB875A5.30501@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303933921-10310-1-git-send-email-dvhart@linux.intel.com>
On 11-04-27 03:51 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> The atom-pc BSP which the n450 is based on was originally intended for single
> CPU. The n450 is a single-core hyperthreaded CPU, so CONFIG_SMP and
> CONFIG_SCHED_SMT are required to access the second hardware thread. These
> patches add the newly created cfg/smp.scc config fragment to the recipe.
>
> The current n450 BSP uses linux-yocto-stable (2.6.34), which was an oversight.
> These patches add support for the linux-yocto (2.6.37) recipe and separately
> enable that as the default. I have tested the linux-yocto kernel and confirmed
> it boots, has functional networking, and can suspend and resume.
>
> After some discussion with Tom, it seems that there is adequate testing planned
> for the point release to allow for moving to the linux-yocto recipe. Note that
> fixing bug 1010 makes significant changes to whichever kernel we choose
Was this supposed to read "does not make significant changes" ? Looks
pretty minor to me (outside of jumping kernels :).
> to use. Before I commit to meta-intel however, I would like the input of the QA
> team.
>
> How much testing was planned for the n450 originally? How much additional
> testing would be required if we make the new kernel the default?
For what its worth our other x86 testing should have largely covered
this. If we can't count on the transitive value of our testing using
the common fragments/drivers/arch, then we don't have much to count on.
I see little risk in this myself, and would support the default changing
to linux-yocto in 1.0.1.
Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darren Hart
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 19:51 [PATCH 0/3] n450: add 2.6.37 kernel recipe and SMP support Darren Hart
2011-04-27 19:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] n450: enable SMP and SCHED_SMT Darren Hart
2011-04-27 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] n450: add linux_yocto (2.6.37) bbappend Darren Hart
2011-04-27 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] n450: use linux-yocto (2.6.37) by default Darren Hart
2011-04-27 19:59 ` Bruce Ashfield [this message]
2011-04-27 22:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] n450: add 2.6.37 kernel recipe and SMP support Darren Hart
2011-04-28 0:18 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB875A5.30501@windriver.com \
--to=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.