From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Grinberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap2plus: GPIO cleanup mach-omap2/* Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:17:03 +0300 Message-ID: <4DB9146F.2080002@compulab.co.il> References: <1303895153-451-1-git-send-email-grinberg@compulab.co.il> <20110427140129.GH3755@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 50.23.254.54-static.reverse.softlayer.com ([50.23.254.54]:50831 "EHLO softlayer.compulab.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754245Ab1D1HRJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 03:17:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Grazvydas Ignotas Cc: Tony Lindgren , Kevin Hilman , Felipe Balbi , Mike Rapoport , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 04/27/11 18:58, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Igor Grinberg [110427 02:02]: >>> use gpio_request_() instead of multiple gpiolib calls, >>> remove unneeded variables, etc. >> Great :) > I think this does conflict with Mike's "omap: cleanup board files" > series though. Yep, as I've stated in the description ;) I've started working on this before Mike submitted his series and now I want to get some responses before any rebase work is done. -- Regards, Igor. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grinberg@compulab.co.il (Igor Grinberg) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:17:03 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] arm: omap2plus: GPIO cleanup mach-omap2/* In-Reply-To: References: <1303895153-451-1-git-send-email-grinberg@compulab.co.il> <20110427140129.GH3755@atomide.com> Message-ID: <4DB9146F.2080002@compulab.co.il> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/27/11 18:58, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Igor Grinberg [110427 02:02]: >>> use gpio_request_() instead of multiple gpiolib calls, >>> remove unneeded variables, etc. >> Great :) > I think this does conflict with Mike's "omap: cleanup board files" > series though. Yep, as I've stated in the description ;) I've started working on this before Mike submitted his series and now I want to get some responses before any rebase work is done. -- Regards, Igor.