* eglibc 2.13 upgrade
@ 2011-04-27 16:21 Khem Raj
2011-04-27 16:44 ` Koen Kooi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-04-27 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Hi
I have eglibc 2.13 upgrade done locally and has been building fine for
all architectures. I have added 2.13 recipes and not
deleted the 2.12, This works ok except when setting the SRCREV. Since
we have a single file called
conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc to store this
information there can not be two SRCREV for two versions of same
package unless we move them to
recipes which is under work but not yet done. Thats one reason to hold
these patches. I can propose them if we are ok with
removing 2.12 recipes then it becomes straight forward
Opinions ?
-Khem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: eglibc 2.13 upgrade
2011-04-27 16:21 eglibc 2.13 upgrade Khem Raj
@ 2011-04-27 16:44 ` Koen Kooi
2011-04-27 20:13 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-04-27 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't affected by RPs concerns
Op 27 apr. 2011 om 18:21 heeft Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> Hi
>
> I have eglibc 2.13 upgrade done locally and has been building fine for
> all architectures. I have added 2.13 recipes and not
> deleted the 2.12, This works ok except when setting the SRCREV. Since
> we have a single file called
> conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc to store this
> information there can not be two SRCREV for two versions of same
> package unless we move them to
> recipes which is under work but not yet done. Thats one reason to hold
> these patches. I can propose them if we are ok with
> removing 2.12 recipes then it becomes straight forward
>
> Opinions ?
>
> -Khem
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: eglibc 2.13 upgrade
2011-04-27 16:44 ` Koen Kooi
@ 2011-04-27 20:13 ` Khem Raj
2011-04-28 22:03 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-04-27 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't affected by RPs concerns
I am ok doing that but here
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-April/001536.html
it seems we still need to investigate it before we start moving
SRCREVs to recipes.
>
> Op 27 apr. 2011 om 18:21 heeft Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have eglibc 2.13 upgrade done locally and has been building fine for
>> all architectures. I have added 2.13 recipes and not
>> deleted the 2.12, This works ok except when setting the SRCREV. Since
>> we have a single file called
>> conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc to store this
>> information there can not be two SRCREV for two versions of same
>> package unless we move them to
>> recipes which is under work but not yet done. Thats one reason to hold
>> these patches. I can propose them if we are ok with
>> removing 2.12 recipes then it becomes straight forward
>>
>> Opinions ?
>>
>> -Khem
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: eglibc 2.13 upgrade
2011-04-27 20:13 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-04-28 22:03 ` Saul Wold
2011-04-28 22:30 ` Khem Raj
2011-05-04 22:50 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2011-04-28 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 04/27/2011 01:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Koen Kooi<koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't affected by RPs concerns
>
> I am ok doing that but here
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-April/001536.html
>
> it seems we still need to investigate it before we start moving
> SRCREVs to recipes.
>
We are days away from having this implemented (early next week is the
plan right now). Once you see the big pull that moves SRCREVs, then you
can go ahead with your upgrade.
Also creating a new recipe instead of moving the old one will cause a
lose of history in git, we would prefer moves or create new / delete.
Sau!
>>
>> Op 27 apr. 2011 om 18:21 heeft Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have eglibc 2.13 upgrade done locally and has been building fine for
>>> all architectures. I have added 2.13 recipes and not
>>> deleted the 2.12, This works ok except when setting the SRCREV. Since
>>> we have a single file called
>>> conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc to store this
>>> information there can not be two SRCREV for two versions of same
>>> package unless we move them to
>>> recipes which is under work but not yet done. Thats one reason to hold
>>> these patches. I can propose them if we are ok with
>>> removing 2.12 recipes then it becomes straight forward
>>>
>>> Opinions ?
>>>
>>> -Khem
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: eglibc 2.13 upgrade
2011-04-28 22:03 ` Saul Wold
@ 2011-04-28 22:30 ` Khem Raj
2011-04-30 22:12 ` Khem Raj
2011-05-04 22:50 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-04-28 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 01:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Koen Kooi<koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't
>>> affected by RPs concerns
>>
>> I am ok doing that but here
>>
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-April/001536.html
>>
>> it seems we still need to investigate it before we start moving
>> SRCREVs to recipes.
>>
> We are days away from having this implemented (early next week is the plan
> right now). Once you see the big pull that moves SRCREVs, then you can go
> ahead with your upgrade.
>
> Also creating a new recipe instead of moving the old one will cause a lose
> of history in git, we would prefer moves or create new / delete.
I would move if we decide that its an upgrade and we dont need
2.12 anymore othereise It will be created new along side 2.12 problem
with creating
new is that it carries lot of history from 2.12 but does not associate
with it directly
renaming/moving will atleast have that link but thats besides
>
> Sau!
>
>>>
>>> Op 27 apr. 2011 om 18:21 heeft Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com> het volgende
>>> geschreven:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have eglibc 2.13 upgrade done locally and has been building fine for
>>>> all architectures. I have added 2.13 recipes and not
>>>> deleted the 2.12, This works ok except when setting the SRCREV. Since
>>>> we have a single file called
>>>> conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc to store this
>>>> information there can not be two SRCREV for two versions of same
>>>> package unless we move them to
>>>> recipes which is under work but not yet done. Thats one reason to hold
>>>> these patches. I can propose them if we are ok with
>>>> removing 2.12 recipes then it becomes straight forward
>>>>
>>>> Opinions ?
>>>>
>>>> -Khem
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: eglibc 2.13 upgrade
2011-04-28 22:30 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-04-30 22:12 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-04-30 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 04/27/2011 01:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Koen Kooi<koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't
>>>> affected by RPs concerns
>>>
>>> I am ok doing that but here
>>>
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-April/001536.html
>>>
>>> it seems we still need to investigate it before we start moving
>>> SRCREVs to recipes.
>>>
>> We are days away from having this implemented (early next week is the plan
>> right now). Once you see the big pull that moves SRCREVs, then you can go
>> ahead with your upgrade.
>>
>> Also creating a new recipe instead of moving the old one will cause a lose
>> of history in git, we would prefer moves or create new / delete.
>
> I would move if we decide that its an upgrade and we dont need
> 2.12 anymore othereise It will be created new along side 2.12 problem
> with creating
> new is that it carries lot of history from 2.12 but does not associate
> with it directly
> renaming/moving will atleast have that link but thats besides
>
>>
>> Sau!
>>
>>>>
>>>> Op 27 apr. 2011 om 18:21 heeft Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com> het volgende
>>>> geschreven:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I have eglibc 2.13 upgrade done locally and has been building fine for
>>>>> all architectures. I have added 2.13 recipes and not
>>>>> deleted the 2.12, This works ok except when setting the SRCREV. Since
>>>>> we have a single file called
>>>>> conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc to store this
>>>>> information there can not be two SRCREV for two versions of same
>>>>> package unless we move them to
>>>>> recipes which is under work but not yet done. Thats one reason to hold
>>>>> these patches. I can propose them if we are ok with
>>>>> removing 2.12 recipes then it becomes straight forward
>>>>>
>>>>> Opinions ?
>>>>>
I have staged a contrib branch with eglibc 2.13 upgrade
its here
http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/eglibc-2.13
(top 1 patch)
Please try it out and report any issues you see
Thanks
-Khem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: eglibc 2.13 upgrade
2011-04-28 22:03 ` Saul Wold
2011-04-28 22:30 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-05-04 22:50 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-05-04 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On (28/04/11 15:03), Saul Wold wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 01:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Koen Kooi<koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> >>Why not move those srcrevs into the recipe? IIRC these ones aren't affected by RPs concerns
> >
> >I am ok doing that but here
> >http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-April/001536.html
> >
> >it seems we still need to investigate it before we start moving
> >SRCREVs to recipes.
> >
> We are days away from having this implemented (early next week is
> the plan right now). Once you see the big pull that moves SRCREVs,
> then you can go ahead with your upgrade.
The SRCREV move happened today. I have updated the eglibc patch
accordingly and pushed it to contrib branch here. I have earlier
tested it on all arches this time I tested only on arm and it still
works fine. So please try it out in your configurations and let me know
if anything is needed.
branch is here
http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/eglibc-2.13
Thanks
-Khem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-04 22:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-27 16:21 eglibc 2.13 upgrade Khem Raj
2011-04-27 16:44 ` Koen Kooi
2011-04-27 20:13 ` Khem Raj
2011-04-28 22:03 ` Saul Wold
2011-04-28 22:30 ` Khem Raj
2011-04-30 22:12 ` Khem Raj
2011-05-04 22:50 ` Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.