From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Hofmann Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:31:06 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH/RFC] ath9k PER/ratecontrol In-Reply-To: <4DBA9F03.3050306@openwrt.org> References: <1303983401-28884-1-git-send-email-andreas.hofmann@corscience.de> <4DBA9F03.3050306@openwrt.org> Message-ID: <4DBABD9A.3070309@corscience.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Hi Felix, On 29.04.2011 13:20, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2011-04-28 11:36 AM, Andreas Hofmann wrote: > You could try using minstrel_ht instead of the ath9k rate control. > People have told me that it produces much lower PER, it might help for > both performance and reliability of your video transmission. I did try that and it performed better than the default ath9k-ratecontrol, but with focus on PER, the slowed down ath9k-ratecontrol gave even better results. I did not inspect the performance regarding maximum data rate during testing, though. Kind regards, Andreas