From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:31:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBC3976.7030205@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110430121734.GF29280@htj.dyndns.org>
On 04/30/2011 05:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Yinghai.
>
> Nice catch, but,
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:14:14PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo correctly
>>
>> During testing 32bit numa unifying code from tj, found one system with more than 64g
>> fail to use numa.
>>
>> It turn out we do not trim that numa meminfo correctly with max_pfn.
>> start could be bigger than 64g too.
>>
>> Also need to make the checking in seperated loop.
>
> Why?
so do not need to compare them with low/high in following inner loop.
>
> Isn't all that necessary the following?
>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: work/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ work/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct n
> bi->end = min(bi->end, high);
>
> /* and there's no empty block */
> - if (bi->start == bi->end) {
> + if (bi->start >= bi->end) {
> numa_remove_memblk_from(i--, mi);
> continue;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-30 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 15:28 [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86-64, NUMA: trivial cleanups for setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86-32, NUMA: Automatically set apicid -> node in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, NUMA: Unify 32/64bit numa_cpu_node() implementation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86-32, NUMA: Make apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() optional Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 16:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 23:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 23:11 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Rename setup_node_bootmem to setup_node_data Yinghai Lu
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, NUMA: rename srat_64.c to srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, NUMA: make srat.c 32bit safe Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86-32, NUMA: Move get_memcfg_numa() into numa_32.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, NUMA: Move numa_nodes_parsed to numa.[hc] Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86-32, NUMA: implement temporary NUMA init shims Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86-32, NUMA: Replace srat_32.c with srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86-32, NUMA: Update numaq to use new NUMA init protocol Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, NUMA: Move NUMA init logic from numa_64.c to numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, NUMA: Enable build of generic NUMA init code on 32bit Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86-32, NUMA: Add @start and @end to init_alloc_remap() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 20/25] x86, NUMA: Initialize and use remap allocator from setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] x86, NUMA: Make 32bit use common NUMA init path Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86, NUMA: Make numa_init_array() static Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, NUMA: Rename amdtopology_64.c to amdtopology.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, NUMA: Enable CONFIG_AMD_NUMA on 32bit too Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, NUMA: Enable emulation " Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 18:15 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:33 ` [PATCH] x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 0:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-01 10:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 19:44 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in separated loop Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 16:31 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBC3976.7030205@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.