From: Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: neilb@suse.de, Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: md question re: max_hw_sectors_kb
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:20:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC0639E.1070707@sgi.com> (raw)
Resending to linux-raid.
Hi Neil,
My name is Mike Reed. I work at SGI. I've been looking at a performance
issue with md writes and have tracked it down to the md device not having
a high enough initial max_hw_sectors_kb setting.
There is code in blk_queue_make_request() which lowers the default value
from INT_MAX to BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS, which is 255. This is generally
lower than all the underlying devices with which I use md.
As md appears to be a stacking driver, i.e., it calls disk_stack_limits()
for each member of a volume, it would seem reasonable for md to use the,
INT_MAX setting for max_hw_sectors_kb instead of BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS.
I have tried this, and have observed that md correctly limits the md device's
max_sectors_kb to the value of the underlying devices in my mirror volume.
Is this the correct way to address this issue?
Applies to linux-2.6.39-rc4.
Signed-off-by: Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>
--- drivers/md/md.c 2011-04-18 21:26:00.000000000 -0700
+++ drivers/md/md.c.new 2011-04-21 15:53:11.452536201 -0700
@@ -4328,6 +4328,7 @@ static int md_alloc(dev_t dev, char *nam
mddev->queue->queuedata = mddev;
blk_queue_make_request(mddev->queue, md_make_request);
+ blk_queue_max_sectors(mddev->queue, INT_MAX);
disk = alloc_disk(1 << shift);
if (!disk) {
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-03 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-03 20:20 Michael Reed [this message]
2011-05-04 17:58 ` md question re: max_hw_sectors_kb Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-04 18:08 ` Bernd Schubert
2011-05-09 23:52 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-12 3:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-31 3:06 ` fibreraid
2011-05-06 4:24 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-06 4:40 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-09 16:02 ` Michael Reed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DC0639E.1070707@sgi.com \
--to=mdr@sgi.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.