All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Kichukov <hijacker@oldum.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] List fault?
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 06:23:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC2424C.2090707@oldum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC0791D.903@bowenvale.co.nz>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Let's go for it then, count me in!

On 05/05/2011 05:10 AM, Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:06 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd 
>> suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if
>> it has straightened up it's act.I'd also like a comment from the list
>> maintainer or a moderator in his / her stead.
> 
> The argument against that it is well neigh impossible to move the list
> if the lists dies again, and we all loose contact with each other.  We
> can only move the list while we are a coordinated group, and the only
> means we have of coordinating is this list.  Dying again soon seems
> likely.  I don't know why the list burst into life this time around, but
> it has happened several times before only to die again a short while
> later.
> 
> I like others think the list and its associated HOWTO is a pretty
> important resource.  It would be nice to rescue it while we have the
> chance.
> 
>> I'd also like a comment from the list maintainer or a moderator in
>> his / her stead.
> 
> This person would be very handy if they pop up, but I would not be
> waiting around for them.
> 
> The current problem we have is a social one.  We are a highly technical
> group.  Just about of any of us could run a list server.  I imagine most
> of us have the resources to do so.  So the problem isn't running the
> server.  It is organising ourselves so the list is can be maintained
> over decades as participants come and go.  Having one person in charge,
> running a domain name owned by them or on hardware owned by them is not
> a good way to go.
> 
> So Radu your offer to set up the list is great - but since it just
> replicates the situation we are in now I don't think it or similar
> offers are such a good idea.
> 
> A list on vger.kernel.org does seem like a workable solution.  Large a
> third party provider such as google groups, yahoo groups, github,
> sourceforge or savanaha may be an even better solution as they would be
> just a reliable, and they provide a web page were we could collaborate
> on for things like HOWTO's.  We would just have to organise among
> ourselves governance of the list properly.
> 
> Normally I'd suggest we explore these other alternatives.  But we don't
> know when the axe will fall again.  The chief attraction of
> vger.kernel.org seems to be we don't have to organise governance - we
> just hand it over to davem and matti (vger's admins).  So there is no
> mucking around with internal politics - one or more of us just ask them
> to set set up the list.
> 
> So who is in favour of doing this ASAP - like within the next few week
> or so?  If you respond to this email, we can use the archived responses
> as proof to vger.kernel.org's admins there is sufficient interest to
> make it there worth their while.
> 
>> However I think that this list (LARTC) is well known and documented all 
>> over the place.  So even if we migrate elsewhere, there will still be 
>> people that stumble on to this list.
> 
> Yes, but there is nothing we can do about that.  Stumbling over a dead
> list is not useful, regardless of how easy it is to find.  A working
> list what we need, and that should be our first priority.
> 
> If the person who owns lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl pops up then we can do
> other things that ameliorate "stumble over this list" problem - things
> like putting in email redirects, put notices on web pages and so on.
> But such things are just icing on the cake.  We should not wait to see
> whether we can do it.  Just move the list, and organise the icing later
> if we can.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNwkJMAAoJEDFLYVOGGjgXhCQH/R0SgutHC9Y7L0pUYeJizf9J
HDafjXWgDsmpstRWR8eZgBQU4K0RqXl7D88QA7yeHLm3tBWc2zZ3lQcYNNJzex82
6D5umoFRSH+ukDV2o5VQm9SMQmgXs9BenmCFPD73Vq5pN6I7OrsZ0AP0MkYYZ8oE
U5SXngkVIRLZzArnE7OBH7PDtXMeHSW+GQhZyACM134ZXtle+XmpOqdnkf5Bf3L7
+KoBnG8TuE6w7ruyY6Mfa3cjMdlx+b0lQnlFSGZrF7EMtZchzwLTJ1yWVt+/zdsd
Yxnd4S80LWz7/GccmSyfzjdoe2MOtdznLJTuBe4Ciyes7Yh/K4xyXJO+tX1OZnw=sLHO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-05  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-03 21:52 [LARTC] List fault? Don Gould
2011-05-04  3:43 ` Andreas Unterkircher
2011-05-04  6:04 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-05-04  6:15 ` Nikolay Kichukov
2011-05-04  6:26 ` Kim Bak
2011-05-04 12:35 ` Vitaly Tskhovrebov
2011-05-04 12:50 ` Andy Fletcher
2011-05-04 13:02 ` João Almeida
2011-05-04 16:56 ` Radu Oprisan
2011-05-04 17:02 ` Brent Clark
2011-05-04 17:03 ` Radu Oprisan
2011-05-04 18:06 ` Grant Taylor
2011-05-04 18:37 ` Radu Oprisan
2011-05-04 19:11 ` Gregory Papangeles
2011-05-04 19:11 ` Grant Taylor
2011-05-04 19:24 ` Grant Taylor
2011-05-04 19:24 ` Micro-Shock
2011-05-04 19:33 ` Radoslaw Horodniczy
2011-05-04 19:37 ` David Hough
2011-05-04 19:40 ` Stuart Sheldon
2011-05-04 19:59 ` Radu Oprisan
2011-05-04 19:59 ` Grant Taylor
2011-05-04 20:12 ` Gregory Papangeles
2011-05-04 20:14 ` Javier Charne
2011-05-04 20:15 ` Ruben Rögels
2011-05-04 20:18 ` Ralph Loader
2011-05-04 20:19 ` Victor Julien
2011-05-04 21:56 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-04 23:17 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-05-04 23:18 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-05-04 23:40 ` Russell Stuart
2011-05-04 23:56 ` Alex Samad
2011-05-05  1:23 ` Indra Tjahjono
2011-05-05  2:10 ` Russell Stuart
2011-05-05  4:33 ` Alexander Samad
2011-05-05  5:59 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-05-05  6:23 ` Nikolay Kichukov [this message]
2011-05-05 12:44 ` Luciano Ruete
2011-05-05 13:52 ` Andrew Burgess
2011-05-05 15:19 ` João Almeida
2011-05-06  6:39 ` Adrian Moisey
2011-05-06 12:30 ` Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC2424C.2090707@oldum.net \
    --to=hijacker@oldum.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.