Hi Denis, On 05/05/2011 06:11, Denis Kenzior wrote: >> diff --git a/include/emulator.h b/include/emulator.h >> index 5cd894b..a7fc23b 100644 >> --- a/include/emulator.h >> +++ b/include/emulator.h >> @@ -105,6 +105,24 @@ enum ofono_emulator_request_type ofono_emulator_request_get_type( >> void ofono_emulator_set_indicator(struct ofono_emulator *em, >> const char *name, int value); >> >> +ofono_bool_t ofono_emulator_setup_ppp(struct ofono_emulator *em, int fd, >> + const char *server_ip, const char *peer_ip, >> + const char *primary_dns, >> + const char *secondary_dns); >> + >> +int ofono_emulator_get_uid(struct ofono_emulator *em); >> + > I'm not particularly happy with this, we should try to de-couple the > private network provider from the emulator. We might end up with other > consumers later. > >> +struct emulator_network_provision_driver { >> + char *name; >> + int (*get_settings)(struct ofono_emulator *em); >> + void (*release)(int uid); >> +}; >> + > I'd say you're on the right track here, but modeling this even closer to > gprs-provision might be a good idea. Except you'll need to use a > callback, so something like: > > struct ofono_private_network_settings { > ... > }; > > typedef (ofono_private_network_cb_t)(...); > > struct ofono_private_network_driver { > char *name; > int (*request)(ofono_private_network_cb_t cb, void *data); > void (*release)(int id); > }; > >> +int ofono_emulator_network_driver_register( >> + const struct emulator_network_provision_driver *d); >> +void ofono_emulator_network_driver_unregister( >> + const struct emulator_network_provision_driver *d); >> + > And then add __ofono_private_network_request / release to src/ofono.h > for now. Similar to how gprs_provision does things. Should we add a new src into ofono that would implement those request/release functions and register the ofono_private_network_driver? Something like private-network-provision.c? Then we would have the driver and callback type definition into private-network-provision.h. Kind regards, Guillaume