From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 17:09:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DC40F36.5020005@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 17:09:42 +0200 From: Milan Broz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110502155909.GA11763@tansi.org> <20110503043754.GB20873@tansi.org> <20110503081955.GA2739@tansi.org> <4DBFD162.8070504@redhat.com> <87F31F97-C7E2-4306-BE1D-A8F690A95F3E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87F31F97-C7E2-4306-BE1D-A8F690A95F3E@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] luks, swap and crash List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Francois Chenais Cc: "dm-crypt@saout.de" > Here is a link about something similar on gentoo system. > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-852353-start-0.html Thanks, nice test... I was able to lock up older kernel with that but 2.6.38.5 (and 2.6.39-rc) works without problems for me (at least for this short test). So I hope the problem was fixed upstream... (There was big changes both in dmcrypt and workqueue subsystem.) Please let me know if you can still lock the system this way (with upstream kernel). Milan