From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Rickman Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 12:40:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Will there ever be EMC6w201 support? Message-Id: <4DC68F29.5080600@myamigos.us> List-Id: References: <20110414034609.476411A9866@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20110414034609.476411A9866@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On 5/8/2011 7:29 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2011 06:19:11 -0500, Jeff Rickman wrote: >> On 5/8/2011 1:27 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: >>> Did you try loading this original i8k driver? Did it work? What are the >>> contents of /proc/i8k then? >> >> [testing with original "i8k" module] >> (1) Removed new "i8k" module from /lib/modules tree >> (2) Checked "/proc/i8k". No such file or directory >> (3) Copied original "i8k" module back to it's location in: >> /lib/modules/`uname -r`/drivers/char >> (4) Ran "depmod -a" >> (5) Rebooted PC to obtain known stable state >> >> After reboot... >> (6) Checked "/proc/i8k". No such file or directory >> (7) Checked "lsmod". "i8k" is not loaded >> (8) Attempted to load original "i8k" but it crashed. >> Crash output is attached. >> (9) Rechecked "/proc/i8k". No such file or directory >> (10) Rebooted PC to return to known stable state > > This means that my changes aren't responsible for the crash, nor is the > fact of building the driver standalone. So I will leave it to the > Fedora kernel maintainers to resolve, if you care and if they are > interested. > I agree with your comments. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors