From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50840) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJQyW-0003l3-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 09:58:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJQyR-0007lR-TS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 09:58:16 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:48300 helo=mx1.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJQyR-0007lH-LO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 09:58:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC7F2F1.5030006@suse.de> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 15:58:09 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1304593113-10689-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <1304593113-10689-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V15 00/18] Xen device model support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: anthony.perard@citrix.com Cc: Xen Devel , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini On 05/05/2011 12:58 PM, anthony.perard@citrix.com wrote: > From: Anthony PERARD > > Hi all, > > Here is an update on the series that add the support of a Xen HVM guest to > QEMU. It doesn't introduce regressions and I really don't want to keep this patch set hanging more than it should be. If we encounter anything that needs changes later, we can change them later and as long as the patches don't affect anything but Xen, I'm perfectly fine with the Xen folks breaking their own support :). So from my side this set is: Acked-by: Alexander Graf Anthony, feel like pulling? Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] Xen device model support Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 15:58:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4DC7F2F1.5030006@suse.de> References: <1304593113-10689-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1304593113-10689-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org To: anthony.perard@citrix.com Cc: Xen Devel , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/05/2011 12:58 PM, anthony.perard@citrix.com wrote: > From: Anthony PERARD > > Hi all, > > Here is an update on the series that add the support of a Xen HVM guest to > QEMU. It doesn't introduce regressions and I really don't want to keep this patch set hanging more than it should be. If we encounter anything that needs changes later, we can change them later and as long as the patches don't affect anything but Xen, I'm perfectly fine with the Xen folks breaking their own support :). So from my side this set is: Acked-by: Alexander Graf Anthony, feel like pulling? Alex