From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Jackson Subject: Re: X11 performance regressions Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:53:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC81C25.7070307@redhat.com> References: <4DC6DF5D.2050006@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A579E8DD for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 09:53:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DC6DF5D.2050006@t-online.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Knut Petersen Cc: intel-gfx List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On 5/8/11 2:22 PM, Knut Petersen wrote: > Software > ======= > 1.86 MHz system: > opensuse 11.2 > X.Org X Server 1.6.5 > Release Date: 2009-10-11 > kernel 2.6.38.5 > > 2.00 MHz system: > opensuse 11.4 > X.Org X Server 1.10.99 > git-tree, 2011-may-7 > kernel 2.6.39-rc4-drm-intel-staging I'd start by suspecting differences in .config for the kernel between the two, particularly since... > 10000000 trep @ 0.0032 msec (309000.0/sec): Dot > 40000000 trep @ 0.0006 msec (1650000.0/sec): Dot Dot dispatch is so completely CPU-dominated that I suspect you're simply measuring CPU overhead somewhere else. For example, if one of those kernels is built with spinlock debugging and the other isn't. - ajax