From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2.nedap.com ([213.160.213.92] helo=smtp.nedap.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QJkxA-0005HU-DZ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:18:12 +0200 Received: from nvs0066.nedap.local ([10.91.8.1]) by smtp.nedap.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 May 2011 13:15:27 +0200 X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <0bf4d2110000456c@nedap.com> Received: from [10.2.40.10] ([10.2.40.10]) by nedap.com ([10.91.8.1]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.0) id 0bf4d2110000456c ; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:15:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4DC91E4E.3070109@nedap.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:15:26 +0200 From: Jaap de Jong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4DC8F3A2.2090005@nedap.com> <20110510100020.GA10493@mx.loc> <1305022004.8000.149.camel@phil-desktop> <4DC91B33.9080807@nedap.com> <1305025696.8000.155.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1305025696.8000.155.camel@phil-desktop> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2011 11:15:27.0544 (UTC) FILETIME=[90CAF380:01CC0F03] Subject: Re: x86_64 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:18:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>> is there any support for 64 bit intel/amd machines? >>>>> And if so, how to build for them? >>>> Can we settle on a name please for i want to add a qemu machine for >>>> testing x86_64? >>>> >>>> x8664 >>>> amd64 >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Opinions? >>> "x86_64" seems to be what's currently used as the architecture name. If >>> you want a value for ${MACHINE} then I guess something like >>> "x86_64-generic" would do. I don't think there's any prohibition >>> against underscores in machine names. >>> >>> p. >> So I'm guessing it is not possible at this very moment? > Depends what you mean by "not possible". There doesn't seem to be any > existing machine config file which targets x86_64, but I don't think > there is any reason that you couldn't trivially create one; something > along the lines of: > > $ cat>conf/machine/x84_64-generic.conf< TARGET_ARCH = "x86_64" > GLIBC_ADDONS = "nptl" > GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-tls" > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux" > KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "bzImage" > EOF > $ > > p. Will try that; is there any 64 bit output to be expected? Jaap.