From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2.nedap.com ([213.160.213.92] helo=smtp.nedap.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QJmXw-0002EJ-P0 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:00:16 +0200 Received: from nvs0066.nedap.local ([10.91.8.1]) by smtp.nedap.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 10 May 2011 14:57:31 +0200 X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <0c52443f00004a95@nedap.com> Received: from [10.2.40.10] ([10.2.40.10]) by nedap.com ([10.91.8.1]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.0) id 0c52443f00004a95 ; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:57:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4DC9363B.6070909@nedap.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:57:31 +0200 From: Jaap de Jong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4DC8F3A2.2090005@nedap.com> <20110510100020.GA10493@mx.loc> <1305022004.8000.149.camel@phil-desktop> <4DC91B33.9080807@nedap.com> <1305025696.8000.155.camel@phil-desktop> <4DC91E4E.3070109@nedap.com> In-Reply-To: <4DC91E4E.3070109@nedap.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2011 12:57:31.0314 (UTC) FILETIME=[D2D81920:01CC0F11] Subject: Re: x86_64 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:00:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>>> is there any support for 64 bit intel/amd machines? >>>>>> And if so, how to build for them? >>>>> Can we settle on a name please for i want to add a qemu machine for >>>>> testing x86_64? >>>>> >>>>> x8664 >>>>> amd64 >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> Opinions? >>>> "x86_64" seems to be what's currently used as the architecture name. If >>>> you want a value for ${MACHINE} then I guess something like >>>> "x86_64-generic" would do. I don't think there's any prohibition >>>> against underscores in machine names. >>>> >>>> p. >>> So I'm guessing it is not possible at this very moment? >> Depends what you mean by "not possible". There doesn't seem to be any >> existing machine config file which targets x86_64, but I don't think >> there is any reason that you couldn't trivially create one; something >> along the lines of: >> >> $ cat>conf/machine/x84_64-generic.conf<> TARGET_ARCH = "x86_64" >> GLIBC_ADDONS = "nptl" >> GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-tls" >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux" >> KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "bzImage" >> EOF >> $ >> >> p. > Will try that; is there any 64 bit output to be expected? > Jaap. > bitbake ends with | /media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/x86_64/x86_64-angstrom-linux/bin/ld: cannot find /lib64/libc.so.6 inside /media/OpenEmbedded/release-2010.12/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-angstrom-linux There is only a lib directory and no lib64 directory... Jaap