From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sshtylyov@mvista.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:43:21 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] usb/gadget: at91sam9g20 fix end point max packet size In-Reply-To: <1305037463-10222-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> References: <1305037463-10222-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Message-ID: <4DC95D19.7070707@ru.mvista.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > on 9g20 they are the same as the 9261 > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c > index 9b7cdb1..41dc093 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c > @@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ static int __init at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > /* newer chips have more FIFO memory than rm9200 */ > - if (cpu_is_at91sam9260()) { > + if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20()) { These shouldn't be used in the drivers at all. WBR, Sergei