diff for duplicates of <4DC9CB47.9000900@secretlab.ca> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index a3c1580..60f1ef0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -21,17 +21,3 @@ On 05/10/2011 04:22 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > When adding the I2C controllers, it seems like they'd just work the > same way as the existing SDHCI code. - -From a philosophical point of view, they should be initialized the same way. - -Are you thinking that the i2c controller should be in the -harmony_devices array and initialized with the other devices? If so i2c -is different in the kernel. An i2c controller isn't registered with -platform_device_register(). - -I may not be understanding your question. - -> -> So, all this already works without putting the board-specific platform -> data definitions into board-dt.c as an temporary measure. -> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 572ad34..ee7f353 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,16 +5,10 @@ "ref\074CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04986AA077@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com\0" "ref\04DC9BD39.30108@secretlab.ca\0" "ref\074CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04986AA0A6@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com\0" - "ref\074CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04986AA0A6-C7FfzLzN0UxDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0John Bonesio <bones-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC 1/2] ARM: Tegra: Device Tree Support: Update how sdhci devices are initialized\0" + "From\0bones@secretlab.ca (John Bonesio)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC 1/2] ARM: Tegra: Device Tree Support: Update how sdhci devices are initialized\0" "Date\0Tue, 10 May 2011 16:33:27 -0700\0" - "To\0Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Olof Johansson <olofj-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>" - linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org <linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> - devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org <devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org> - linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org <linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> - " glikely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org <glikely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 05/10/2011 04:22 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:\n" @@ -39,20 +33,6 @@ "> platform data for them.\n" "> \n" "> When adding the I2C controllers, it seems like they'd just work the\n" - "> same way as the existing SDHCI code.\n" - "\n" - "From a philosophical point of view, they should be initialized the same way.\n" - "\n" - "Are you thinking that the i2c controller should be in the\n" - "harmony_devices array and initialized with the other devices? If so i2c\n" - "is different in the kernel. An i2c controller isn't registered with\n" - "platform_device_register().\n" - "\n" - "I may not be understanding your question.\n" - "\n" - "> \n" - "> So, all this already works without putting the board-specific platform\n" - "> data definitions into board-dt.c as an temporary measure.\n" - > + > same way as the existing SDHCI code. -f58caae4ae7e456418291b462cc263e26205244e3fa01992590627a0cbb7829a +990b3083ce7f603ed2269d887c8b61d7135d7c6e3a4ea243131881ac4acf8b30
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index a3c1580..f64f273 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ On 05/10/2011 04:22 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > When adding the I2C controllers, it seems like they'd just work the > same way as the existing SDHCI code. -From a philosophical point of view, they should be initialized the same way. +>From a philosophical point of view, they should be initialized the same way. Are you thinking that the i2c controller should be in the harmony_devices array and initialized with the other devices? If so i2c diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 572ad34..65df2dd 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ "> When adding the I2C controllers, it seems like they'd just work the\n" "> same way as the existing SDHCI code.\n" "\n" - "From a philosophical point of view, they should be initialized the same way.\n" + ">From a philosophical point of view, they should be initialized the same way.\n" "\n" "Are you thinking that the i2c controller should be in the\n" "harmony_devices array and initialized with the other devices? If so i2c\n" @@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ "> data definitions into board-dt.c as an temporary measure.\n" > -f58caae4ae7e456418291b462cc263e26205244e3fa01992590627a0cbb7829a +5627387419a53d1dd40136d750bd805632207288957e61d15d683b85d9245fcd
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.