From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kang haiyang <hykang@dongniannetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:42:15 +0800
Subject: [ath9k-devel] has anyone done 9280's 1x1 test?
Message-ID: <4DCA21B7.5090303@dongniannetworks.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

hi,

  I connected my AP with client by cable,  both of them use 9280 card.
   AP's driver is madwifi with proprietary hal, client with ath9k driver
on ubuntu 10.10.
  I have done a few test for this 1x1 configuration.

   from the result i saw if AP is set with chainmask 2, the traffic is
almost down,
   and chain 1 vs chain 2 is a little worse than chain 1 vs chain1.
   Am i wrong with some bad configurations for this card?
  
Following is the result:

 (5Ghz, 40Mhz, Cable connection between AP and client, iperf tcp)

1. AP chainmask(tx/rx) 1 , client chainmask(tx/rx) 1
   - AP Rx   100Mbps
   - AP Tx   90Mbps
  
2. AP chainmask 1 , client chainmask 2
    - AP Rx   50Mbps
    - AP Tx   90Mbps

3. AP chainmask 2 , client chainmask 2
    - AP Rx   0
    - AP Tx   0

4. AP chainmask 2 , client chainmask 1
   - AP Rx   0
   - AP Tx   0

best regards,
kang haiyang