From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Björn Smedman" <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: restrict AP beacon intervals
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:10:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DCAC2F0.7090308@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305132500.17892.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On 05/11/2011 09:48 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 17:58 +0200, Björn Smedman wrote:
>
>>> Yes, in theory that's possible, but apparently no driver actually did
>>> this correctly. Also, it didn't seem like anyone really cares, and we
>>> need to enforce some restrictions because otherwise drivers will end up
>>> doing it wrong, and you'll end up having a beacon interval of 200 while
>>> advertising 150 for example, which will totally throw off powersaving
>>> clients.
>>
>> I'm very interested in having multiple AP vifs with different beacon
>> intervals. If we're going to just fail anyway in this case can't we do
>> that from the drivers instead? I would also prefer that from an
>> aesthetic point of view, instead of having broken logic in the drivers
>> "protected" by extra verification in cfg80211.
>
> We can't fail from the drivers, they don't have a failure path.
Maybe we could treat the beacon interval setting as a requested
value, and give the caller some way to know the actual value
that is used by the hardware?
Thanks,
Ben
>
> johannes
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-09 16:41 [PATCH] cfg80211: restrict AP beacon intervals Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 16:46 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-09 16:49 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-09 16:55 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-09 17:20 ` Steve Brown
2011-05-09 17:28 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-10 20:46 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-11 15:58 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-11 16:48 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-11 17:10 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-05-11 17:17 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-11 21:39 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-12 8:14 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-12 18:08 ` Björn Smedman
2011-05-12 18:13 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DCAC2F0.7090308@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=bjorn.smedman@venatech.se \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.