From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Hannemann Subject: Changing the default for net.ipv6.conf.*.use_tempaddr Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:57:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4DCB92F5.3050008@arndnet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from slowhand.arndnet.de ([88.198.19.76]:43845 "EHLO mail.unitix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751449Ab1ELH5o (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 03:57:44 -0400 Received: from [172.26.14.109] (exit.credativ.com [87.139.82.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F01113EA5 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:57:42 +0200 (CEST) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, while reading all the pro and cons mentioned in a recent discussion[1] on debian-devel I wonder if there was a particular reason why Privacy Extensions are disabled by default in linux? Maybe it is time to reconsider the default? Best regards Arnd [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00462.html