From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: X11 performance regressions
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:34:26 +0200
Message-ID: <4DCBA9A2.9020605@t-online.de>
References: <4DC6DF5D.2050006@t-online.de>	<15db10$kicfca@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>	<4DCAA134.4020705@t-online.de>
	<f80fcd$tur5@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>	<4DCB8A0B.8010007@t-online.de>	<72a37e$j3tc1a@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>	<4DCB9920.3060200@t-online.de>
	<013811$leag@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (mailout09.t-online.de [194.25.134.84])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689509E7A9
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 12 May 2011 02:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <013811$leag@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org


> Oh, damage. A compositing WM? If you turn off compositing, do you see
> similar performance levels to xorg-1.6?
> -Chris
>

That makes difference .... 16.300 reps speed up to 1.280.000 reps ... 78.5 times faster.

I think I will  rerun the tests.

cu,
 Knut