From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QKtXl-0006mR-KW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:40:42 +0200 Received: (qmail 28737 invoked by uid 1003); 13 May 2011 14:37:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.165.110) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 May 2011 14:37:49 -0000 Message-ID: <4DCD423C.40802@balister.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:37:48 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1305280030.2421.57.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1305280030.2421.57.camel@phil-desktop> Cc: Phil Blundell , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [oe] Where to host new layers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:40:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/13/2011 05:47 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 02:10 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> I have created couple of layers namely meta-slugos (distro layer) and >> meta-nslu ( machine layer). I was looking for place to host those >> layers. Would they be good under meta-openembedded ? I dont think >> http://www.nslu2-linux.org/ >> has git infrastructure otherwise that would be one place to put it. > > I thought the idea was that meta-openembedded would remain distro- and > machine- neutral and that the BSP bits would live in separate repos. > Whether we want one repo per machine or some kind of shared repository > with a bunch of distros in is, I guess, something of an open question. > > In the short term you could obviously host them on github or somewhere. > (I was originally planning to do that with meta-micro, but it turned out > to be fractionally more convenient to host it on my own git server so I > did that instead.) > > In the longer term I don't think there's any reason we couldn't host > those kinds of distro layers on openembedded.org, either in separate > repositories or a single shared one. I know there was some board > discussion a few months ago about whether or not oe.org should be in the > business of hosting third party BSPs but I'm not quite sure what the > outcome of that was. I'd like to hear what the slugos guys would like to do. Philip From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QKtXl-0006mQ-N9 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 16:40:42 +0200 Received: (qmail 28737 invoked by uid 1003); 13 May 2011 14:37:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@96.240.165.110) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 May 2011 14:37:49 -0000 Message-ID: <4DCD423C.40802@balister.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:37:48 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1305280030.2421.57.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1305280030.2421.57.camel@phil-desktop> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Where to host new layers X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:40:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/13/2011 05:47 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 02:10 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> I have created couple of layers namely meta-slugos (distro layer) and >> meta-nslu ( machine layer). I was looking for place to host those >> layers. Would they be good under meta-openembedded ? I dont think >> http://www.nslu2-linux.org/ >> has git infrastructure otherwise that would be one place to put it. > > I thought the idea was that meta-openembedded would remain distro- and > machine- neutral and that the BSP bits would live in separate repos. > Whether we want one repo per machine or some kind of shared repository > with a bunch of distros in is, I guess, something of an open question. > > In the short term you could obviously host them on github or somewhere. > (I was originally planning to do that with meta-micro, but it turned out > to be fractionally more convenient to host it on my own git server so I > did that instead.) > > In the longer term I don't think there's any reason we couldn't host > those kinds of distro layers on openembedded.org, either in separate > repositories or a single shared one. I know there was some board > discussion a few months ago about whether or not oe.org should be in the > business of hosting third party BSPs but I'm not quite sure what the > outcome of that was. I'd like to hear what the slugos guys would like to do. Philip