From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 6.26.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.35.144] helo=26.mail-out.ovh.net) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QLvCZ-0003TL-OJ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 12:39:03 +0200 Received: (qmail 31303 invoked by uid 503); 16 May 2011 09:55:59 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail94.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 26.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 May 2011 09:55:59 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 May 2011 12:29:34 +0200 Received: from pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.15?) (ebenard%eukrea.com@82.240.38.71) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 16 May 2011 12:29:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4DD0FC8C.4040104@eukrea.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:29:32 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsellmann@portner-elektronik.at References: <201104291145.05479.pgsellmann@portner-elektronik.at> <4DCEB690.1070400@eukrea.com> <201105161155.05490.pgsellmann@portner-elektronik.at> In-Reply-To: <201105161155.05490.pgsellmann@portner-elektronik.at> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 18197920195259051428 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux_2.6.38: update support for PcontrolG20 HW rev 2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:39:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Peter, On 16/05/2011 11:55, Peter Gsellmann wrote: > Am Samstag 14 Mai 2011, 19:06:24 schrieb Eric Bénard: >> On 29/04/2011 11:45, Peter Gsellmann wrote: >>> All prototypes hardware rev 1 are drawn back >>> so default should be rev 2 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Gsellmann >>> --- >>> recipes/linux/linux-2.6.38/pcontrolg20/defconfig | 1761 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../pcontrolg20/pcontrolg20_2.6.38.patch | 235 +++ >>> recipes/linux/linux_2.6.38.bb | 2 + >>> 3 files changed, 1998 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 recipes/linux/linux-2.6.38/pcontrolg20/defconfig >>> create mode 100644 recipes/linux/linux-2.6.38/pcontrolg20/pcontrolg20_2.6.38.patch >>> >> I applied this patch and tried to build the kernel but it seems there is no >> machine definition for pcontrolg20 : can you please resend a patch serie to >> add the kernel support and the machine conf file. > the machine configuration for pcontrolg20 is still not in a stable state: > At least the kernel patch is stable, but for the at91bootstrap i have made changes for lowlevel initialization and memory detection which i have to bring in sync with mainline; right now my at91bootstrap patch looks ugly and would be rejected deservedly. > Same is for U-boot. I patched a specific git-revision with a number of additional commands i need for factory testing. > Even worse, the perpetual discussions about kernel relocation/decompression convinced me to evaluate alternatives like barebox. > good choice ;-) > So my ToDo-list is: > (*) commit kernel.patch > * commit at91bootstrap.patch > * commit U-boot or Barebox patches > * commit conf/machine/pcontrolg20.conf > * commit recipes/pcontrolg20-image.bb > > If its ok for you this would be the first commit. > > I could commit the pcontrolg20.conf also, but the entries for at91boosttrap and u-boot would be commented out. yes a kernel recipe without the machine conf file can't be tested : please send the 2 patches (kernel + conf file), then you will be able to add entries for at91bootstrap & u-boot to the conf file later when you add the support for you board in their respective recipes. thanks Eric