All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Monica Puig-Pey <puigpeym@unican.es>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: How to establish a priority to an interrupt handler
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:51:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD2614A.4060003@unican.es> (raw)

Hi,

I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 with the 2.6.31-11-rt patch installed. I'm
developing a PCI device driver using hardware interrupts.
As I read at the RT wiki
(https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch )
interrupts are moved to kernel threads called Threaded Interrupts in the
RT patch.

I would like to give a priority chosen by me to my IRQ handler, but I
don't know how to do it, or if it is possible (it seems it is).

I've found (http://lwn.net/Articles/302043/ ) that what I had to use in
order to get Threaded Interrupt is:

int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
                      irq_handler_t quick_check_handler,
                      unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev)

But there is not priority there!

Using ps -eo pid,pri,rtprio,cmd I've seen my handler runs with priority 50.

I also used :

int request_irq (unsigned int irq, void (*handler) (int, void *, struct
pt_regs *), unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id);

and using ps command here my handler still runs with priority 50.
Shouldn't it work as a non threaded interrupt then? Why 50 instead 99 or
the highest priority one?

Which function should I use to chose the priority for the IRQ thread?

Is there any other function to call from this context where my handler
could know its priority?

Please I wish to be personally CC'ed the answers/comments posted to the 
list in response to my posting because I'm not subscribed to the list.

Thank you very much

Mónica

             reply	other threads:[~2011-05-17 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-17 11:51 Monica Puig-Pey [this message]
2011-05-18  8:01 ` How to establish a priority to an interrupt handler Clemens Ladisch
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-16 10:26 Monica Puig-Pey
2011-05-16 10:51 ` David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD2614A.4060003@unican.es \
    --to=puigpeym@unican.es \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.