Re: [PATCH v2] w1: Add Maxim/Dallas DS2780 Stand-Alone Fuel Gauge IC support.

[Clifton Barnes <cabarnes@indesign-llc.com>]

On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 Ryan Mallon wrote:

The encoding seems to have messed up on LKML so I'm resending in case
it is messed up for anyone else.

> > +	if ((new_setting != 0) && (new_setting != 1)) {

> Don't need the inner parens.

Unless it's a common convention, I'd rather leave them because I think
it helps readability.

> > +	ret = kstrtou8(buf, 10, &new_setting);

> Might be worth allowing people to write register values in hex also.

If I'm reading the code correctly, I change the base to 0 to achieve
this, correct?

> > +static ssize_t ds2780_get_user_eeprom(struct device *dev,
> > +	struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +	char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	struct power_supply *psy = to_power_supply(dev);
> > +	struct ds2780_device_info *dev_info = to_ds2780_device_info(psy);
> > +
> > +	ret = w1_ds2780_read(dev_info->w1_dev, buf, DS2780_EEPROM_BLOCK0_START,
> > +				DS2780_USER_EEPROM_SIZE);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;

> Not sure that this is really obeying the rules of sysfs which state that
> files should only contain a single value. There is the firmware
> subsystem, but I'm not sure that is really what you want either. Perhaps
> somebody else can suggest an alternative.

It looks like other EEPROMs use bin_attribute. I'll change it to use that
unless there's a better approach.

> > +config W1_SLAVE_DS2780
> > +	tristate "Dallas 2780 battery monitor chip"
> > +	depends on W1
> > +	help
> > +	  If you enable this you will have the DS2780 battery monitor
> > +	  chip support.
> > +
> > +	  The battery monitor chip is used in many batteries/devices
> > +	  as the one who is responsible for charging/discharging/monitoring
> > +	  Li+ batteries.
> > +
> > +	  If you are unsure, say N.
> > +

> This should just be:
> 
> 	config W1_SLAVE_DS2780:
> 	tristate
>
> since CONFIG_BATTERY_DS2780 selects this there is never any need for it
> to be a visible config option.

I did this the same way as the DS2760.  Should this be different?

> > +static ssize_t w1_ds2780_read_bin(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> > +				  struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> > +				  char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
> > +	return w1_ds2780_read(dev, buf, off, count);
> > +}

> What is this for?

It reads raw registers from the device.  It was implemented in the w1_ds2760.c 
file so I kept it.  I suppose you could use this driver without the battery
interface and read the registers that way.

> > +static int new_bat_id(void)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	while (1) {
> > +		int id;
> > +
> > +		ret = idr_pre_get(&bat_idr, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (ret == 0)
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +		mutex_lock(&bat_idr_lock);
> > +		ret = idr_get_new(&bat_idr, NULL, &id);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&bat_idr_lock);
> > +
> > +		if (ret == 0) {
> > +			ret = id & MAX_ID_MASK;
> > +			break;
> > +		} else if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> > +			continue;
> > +		} else {
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}

> Is it common to do this in a while loop? In my experience if the
> idr_get_new fails an error should be returned.

Again, this came from the w1_ds2760.c driver.  If it's more common to
error out, I can change it.

I'm in the process of making the other changes that were suggested.
How should I submit the changes?  A new patch v3 or a patch to v2?
If a patch to v2, how should that be indicated?

-Clif