From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Xen Devel <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:15:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD2C947.9050501@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110517211234.472e32f4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On 05/17/2011 04:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:05:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/xen/Kconfig, drivers/xen/gntdev.c and include/xen/gntdev.h
>> between various commits Linus' tree and various commits from the xen tree.
>>
>> As previously discussed, I have dropped the xen tree for today (as it
>> contains an older version of the changes that were merged into Linus'
>> tree).
> Just wondering if the xen tree is ever going to make a reappearance in
> linux-next?
Konrad's tree has the bulk of the xen work in it at the moment. I'm
doing to start on a few bits and pieces, but I've not decided if I'll
put them into linux-next myself or just push them via Konrad.
So, maybe, but maybe not.
Thanks,
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-17 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-15 1:05 linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-17 11:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-17 19:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-05-18 12:32 ` Ian Campbell
2011-05-18 14:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-05-18 21:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-11 3:57 linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-11 15:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-11 21:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2012-01-11 21:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2012-01-11 22:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15 21:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-15 21:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-15 21:07 ` Jens Axboe
2010-11-22 20:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-22 20:17 ` Jens Axboe
2010-11-22 20:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-27 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-27 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-27 6:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DD2C947.9050501@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.