All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests:Make 225 compare map and fiemap at each block.
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:05:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD3C40F.1040808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=ra8eKxqstqFqDWHYsQpVx66c8BQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/13/2011 11:47 PM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Due to my carelessness, I induced a ugly patch to ext4's fiemap, but
> 225 could not find it.  So I looked into the 225 and could not figure out
> logic in compare_map_and_fiemap(), which seemed to mixed extents with
> blocks.  Then I made 225 compare map and fiemap at each block, the new
> 225 can find another bug in ext4's fiemap.
>
> The new 225 works well on ext3 and ext4 with both 1K and 4K block. However,
> it report fiemap error on xfs with 4K block.  My working tree is 2.6.39-rc3
> pulled from Ted's tree. The error message is as follows.
>
>   QA output created by 225
>   fiemap run without preallocation, with sync
> +map is 'DDHDHHDHHDHDDHDDHDDHHDHDDHDDDDDDHHDDDHHHHDH
> DDDDDDDDHDDHHHDDDHDDHHDDDDDDHHHHHHDDHHHHHDHDHDHDD
> DHDDHD'
> +logical: [       0..      15] phys:       12..      27 flags: 0x000 tot: 16
> +logical: [      17..      31] phys:       29..      43 flags: 0x000 tot: 15
> +logical: [      34..      63] phys:       46..      75 flags: 0x000 tot: 30
> +logical: [      65..      95] phys:       77..     107 flags: 0x001 tot: 31
> +Problem comparing fiemap and map
>   fiemap run without preallocation or sync
> +map is 'DDHDHHDHHDHDDHDDHDDHHDHDDHDDDDDDHHDDDHHHHDH
> DDDDDDDDHDDHHHDDDHDDHHDDDDDDHHHHHHDDHHHHHDHDHDHDD
> DHDDHD'
> +logical: [       0..      15] phys:        0..      15 flags: 0x006 tot: 16
> +Problem comparing fiemap and map
> Ran: 225
> Failures: 225
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
>
> I am not sure this is a bug in new 225 or xfs.
>
> Yongqiang.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang<xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
> ---
>   src/fiemap-tester.c |  223 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   1 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/fiemap-tester.c b/src/fiemap-tester.c
> index 1663f84..99bb5ce 100644
> --- a/src/fiemap-tester.c
> +++ b/src/fiemap-tester.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>    * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>    * along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
>    * Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> + *
> + * Compare map and fiemap at each block,
> + * Yongqiang Yang<xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>, 2011
>    */
>
>   #include<stdio.h>
> @@ -57,7 +60,7 @@ generate_file_mapping(int blocks, int prealloc)
>   	int num_types = 2, cur_block = 0;
>   	int i = 0;
>
> -	map = malloc(sizeof(char) * blocks);
> +	map = malloc(sizeof(char) * (blocks + 1));
>   	if (!map)
>   		return NULL;
>
> @@ -80,7 +83,8 @@ generate_file_mapping(int blocks, int prealloc)
>   		}
>   		cur_block++;
>   	}
> -
> +	
> +	map[blocks] = 0;
>   	return map;
>   }
>
> @@ -247,55 +251,36 @@ check_flags(struct fiemap *fiemap, int blocksize)
>   }
>
>   static int
> -check_data(struct fiemap *fiemap, __u64 logical_offset, int blocksize,
> +check_data(struct fiemap_extent * extent ,  __u64 logical_offset, int
> blocksize,
>   	   int last, int prealloc)
>   {

This chunk is messed up, it's failing to apply.  Overall it looks good, 
but could you clean this up and resend so I can apply it and test it 
more thoroughly?  Thanks,

Josef

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests:Make 225 compare map and fiemap at each block.
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:05:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD3C40F.1040808@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=ra8eKxqstqFqDWHYsQpVx66c8BQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/13/2011 11:47 PM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Due to my carelessness, I induced a ugly patch to ext4's fiemap, but
> 225 could not find it.  So I looked into the 225 and could not figure out
> logic in compare_map_and_fiemap(), which seemed to mixed extents with
> blocks.  Then I made 225 compare map and fiemap at each block, the new
> 225 can find another bug in ext4's fiemap.
>
> The new 225 works well on ext3 and ext4 with both 1K and 4K block. However,
> it report fiemap error on xfs with 4K block.  My working tree is 2.6.39-rc3
> pulled from Ted's tree. The error message is as follows.
>
>   QA output created by 225
>   fiemap run without preallocation, with sync
> +map is 'DDHDHHDHHDHDDHDDHDDHHDHDDHDDDDDDHHDDDHHHHDH
> DDDDDDDDHDDHHHDDDHDDHHDDDDDDHHHHHHDDHHHHHDHDHDHDD
> DHDDHD'
> +logical: [       0..      15] phys:       12..      27 flags: 0x000 tot: 16
> +logical: [      17..      31] phys:       29..      43 flags: 0x000 tot: 15
> +logical: [      34..      63] phys:       46..      75 flags: 0x000 tot: 30
> +logical: [      65..      95] phys:       77..     107 flags: 0x001 tot: 31
> +Problem comparing fiemap and map
>   fiemap run without preallocation or sync
> +map is 'DDHDHHDHHDHDDHDDHDDHHDHDDHDDDDDDHHDDDHHHHDH
> DDDDDDDDHDDHHHDDDHDDHHDDDDDDHHHHHHDDHHHHHDHDHDHDD
> DHDDHD'
> +logical: [       0..      15] phys:        0..      15 flags: 0x006 tot: 16
> +Problem comparing fiemap and map
> Ran: 225
> Failures: 225
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
>
> I am not sure this is a bug in new 225 or xfs.
>
> Yongqiang.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang<xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
> ---
>   src/fiemap-tester.c |  223 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   1 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/fiemap-tester.c b/src/fiemap-tester.c
> index 1663f84..99bb5ce 100644
> --- a/src/fiemap-tester.c
> +++ b/src/fiemap-tester.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>    * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>    * along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
>    * Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> + *
> + * Compare map and fiemap at each block,
> + * Yongqiang Yang<xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>, 2011
>    */
>
>   #include<stdio.h>
> @@ -57,7 +60,7 @@ generate_file_mapping(int blocks, int prealloc)
>   	int num_types = 2, cur_block = 0;
>   	int i = 0;
>
> -	map = malloc(sizeof(char) * blocks);
> +	map = malloc(sizeof(char) * (blocks + 1));
>   	if (!map)
>   		return NULL;
>
> @@ -80,7 +83,8 @@ generate_file_mapping(int blocks, int prealloc)
>   		}
>   		cur_block++;
>   	}
> -
> +	
> +	map[blocks] = 0;
>   	return map;
>   }
>
> @@ -247,55 +251,36 @@ check_flags(struct fiemap *fiemap, int blocksize)
>   }
>
>   static int
> -check_data(struct fiemap *fiemap, __u64 logical_offset, int blocksize,
> +check_data(struct fiemap_extent * extent ,  __u64 logical_offset, int
> blocksize,
>   	   int last, int prealloc)
>   {

This chunk is messed up, it's failing to apply.  Overall it looks good, 
but could you clean this up and resend so I can apply it and test it 
more thoroughly?  Thanks,

Josef

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-14  3:47 [PATCH] xfstests:Make 225 compare map and fiemap at each block Yongqiang Yang
2011-05-14  3:47 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-05-18  3:29 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-05-18  3:29   ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-05-18  3:47   ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-18  3:47     ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-18 13:05 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2011-05-18 13:05   ` Josef Bacik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-18 13:14 Yongqiang Yang
2011-05-18 13:14 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-05-18 13:43 ` Josef Bacik
2011-05-18 13:43   ` Josef Bacik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD3C40F.1040808@redhat.com \
    --to=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.