From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: clear CPUID output of leaf 0xd for Dom0 when xsave is disabled
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:01:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD433C5.4060208@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD3B3370200007800041DB6@vpn.id2.novell.com>
I tested cpuid on a real hardware. If software wants, reading all
sub-leaves are allowed even on hardware which doesn't support XSAVE. The
instruction just returns 0. So I don't think we need to zap output for
sub-leaves > 1.
0x0000000c 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000
edx=0x00000000
0x0000000d 0x00: eax=0x00000003 ebx=0x00000240 ecx=0x00000240
edx=0x00000000
0x0000000d 0x02: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000
edx=0x00000000
0x0000000d 0x3e: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000
edx=0x00000000
On 05/18/2011 04:53 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Linux starting with 2.6.36 uses the XSAVEOPT instruction and has
> certain code paths that look only at the feature bit reported through
> CPUID leaf 0xd sub-leaf 1 (i.e. without qualifying the check with one
> evaluating leaf 4 output). Consequently the hypervisor ought to mimic
> actual hardware in clearing leaf 0xd output when not supporting xsave.
>
> (Note that this is only a minimal fix. It may be necessary, e.g. for
> LWP, to also adjust sub-leaf 0's bit masks and perhaps zap output of
> sub-leaves> 1 when the respective bit in sub-leaf 0 is getting
> cleared.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> @@ -836,6 +836,10 @@ static void pv_cpuid(struct cpu_user_reg
> __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR % 32,&c);
> __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT % 32,&c);
> break;
> + case 0xd: /* XSAVE */
> + if ( xsave_enabled(current) )
> + break;
> + /* fall through */
> case 5: /* MONITOR/MWAIT */
> case 0xa: /* Architectural Performance Monitor Features */
> case 0x8000000a: /* SVM revision and features */
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-18 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 9:53 [PATCH] x86: clear CPUID output of leaf 0xd for Dom0 when xsave is disabled Jan Beulich
2011-05-18 21:01 ` Wei Huang [this message]
2011-05-19 6:47 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <4DD538A2.7050801@amd.com>
[not found] ` <4DD55BF402000078000422E8@vpn.id2.novell.com>
[not found] ` <EE335F95F28A664DB4A21289D2AA053B0109C14662@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com>
2011-05-20 7:08 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DD433C5.4060208@amd.com \
--to=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.