All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: clear CPUID output of leaf 0xd for Dom0 when xsave is disabled
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:01:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD433C5.4060208@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD3B3370200007800041DB6@vpn.id2.novell.com>

I tested cpuid on a real hardware. If software wants, reading all 
sub-leaves are allowed even on hardware which doesn't support XSAVE. The 
instruction just returns 0. So I don't think we need to zap output for 
sub-leaves > 1.


    0x0000000c 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000
    0x0000000d 0x00: eax=0x00000003 ebx=0x00000240 ecx=0x00000240 
edx=0x00000000
    0x0000000d 0x02: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000
    0x0000000d 0x3e: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000

On 05/18/2011 04:53 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Linux starting with 2.6.36 uses the XSAVEOPT instruction and has
> certain code paths that look only at the feature bit reported through
> CPUID leaf 0xd sub-leaf 1 (i.e. without qualifying the check with one
> evaluating leaf 4 output). Consequently the hypervisor ought to mimic
> actual hardware in clearing leaf 0xd output when not supporting xsave.
>
> (Note that this is only a minimal fix. It may be necessary, e.g. for
> LWP, to also adjust sub-leaf 0's bit masks and perhaps zap output of
> sub-leaves>  1 when the respective bit in sub-leaf 0 is getting
> cleared.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> @@ -836,6 +836,10 @@ static void pv_cpuid(struct cpu_user_reg
>           __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR % 32,&c);
>           __clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT % 32,&c);
>           break;
> +    case 0xd: /* XSAVE */
> +        if ( xsave_enabled(current) )
> +            break;
> +        /* fall through */
>       case 5: /* MONITOR/MWAIT */
>       case 0xa: /* Architectural Performance Monitor Features */
>       case 0x8000000a: /* SVM revision and features */
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-18  9:53 [PATCH] x86: clear CPUID output of leaf 0xd for Dom0 when xsave is disabled Jan Beulich
2011-05-18 21:01 ` Wei Huang [this message]
2011-05-19  6:47   ` Jan Beulich
     [not found]     ` <4DD538A2.7050801@amd.com>
     [not found]       ` <4DD55BF402000078000422E8@vpn.id2.novell.com>
     [not found]         ` <EE335F95F28A664DB4A21289D2AA053B0109C14662@SAUSEXMBP01.amd.com>
2011-05-20  7:08           ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD433C5.4060208@amd.com \
    --to=wei.huang2@amd.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.