From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:34:32 -0700 Subject: [ath9k-devel] ath9k implicated in lockups, kernel 2.6.38 In-Reply-To: References: <4DD5355C.90202@candelatech.com> <4DD551BA.4090400@candelatech.com> <4DD56F3C.1000507@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <4DD57ED8.4040905@candelatech.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 05/19/2011 12:58 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote: > Hmm possibly, although I think the other systems might not be pci-e. I > don't think it's hw failure because the same system works fine under F14 > (I have two hard disks and can swap). Also another guy with the same > netbook reported the same problem - my first message on this list > mentions the topic and date. Well, you could try doing a git bisect between the working kernel and .38 It would still be good to know if the same problem happened in another type of machine. If so, any of us would have a chance to reproduce it...but if not, then it's something special about the motherboard/bus/bios/whatever. Thanks, Ben > > -Cam > >> On 19 May 2011 20:28, "Ben Greear" > > wrote: >> >> On 05/19/2011 12:21 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I tried a few more things, I found another ... >> >> We do rmmod a fair bit here, and haven't seen problems lately. >> >> Do you happen to have another system you could try that NIC in? >> >> Ben >> >> >> -Cam >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Ben Greear > >> >> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >> -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com