Hi Denis,

On 19/05/2011 18:11, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> On 05/19/2011 08:03 AM, Guillaume Zajac wrote:
>> ---
>>   src/emulator.c |    4 ++++
>>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/emulator.c b/src/emulator.c
>> index c17b901..251bed8 100644
>> --- a/src/emulator.c
>> +++ b/src/emulator.c
>> @@ -219,15 +219,19 @@ static void dun_ath_cb(GAtServer *server, GAtServerRequestType type,
>>   		if (val != 0)
>>   			goto error;
>>
>> +		g_at_server_suspend(em->server);
>>   		g_at_ppp_unref(em->ppp);
>>   		em->ppp = NULL;
>> +		g_at_server_resume(em->server);
>>
>>   		g_at_server_send_final(server, G_AT_SERVER_RESULT_OK);
>>   		break;
>>
>>   	case G_AT_SERVER_REQUEST_TYPE_COMMAND_ONLY:
>> +		g_at_server_suspend(em->server);
>>   		g_at_ppp_unref(em->ppp);
>>   		em->ppp = NULL;
>> +		g_at_server_resume(em->server);
>>
>>   		g_at_server_send_final(server, G_AT_SERVER_RESULT_OK);
>>   		break;
> This really sounds wrong.  I suggest that we not set the disconnect
> function in GAtPPP when unrefing if GAtPPP is currently suspended.

As it is bound to the escape sequence implementation and ATO0 CB,
I have included it into the v6 of escape sequence implementation.

Kind regards,
Guillaume