All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: rick.jones2@hp.com
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP funny-ness when over-driving a 1Gbps link (and wifi)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:33:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD6DE1C.8090607@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD5E270.3030209@candelatech.com>

On 05/19/2011 08:39 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 05:46 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 17:37 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 05/19/2011 05:24 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> [root@i7-965-1 igb]# netstat -an|grep tcp|grep 8.1.1
>>>>>>> tcp 0 0 8.1.1.1:33038 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>>>>>> tcp 0 0 8.1.1.1:33040 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>>>>>> tcp 0 0 8.1.1.1:33042 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>>>>>> tcp 0 9328612 8.1.1.2:33039 8.1.1.1:33040 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 17083176 8.1.1.1:33038 8.1.1.2:33037 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 9437340 8.1.1.2:33037 8.1.1.1:33038 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 17024620 8.1.1.1:33040 8.1.1.2:33039 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 19557040 8.1.1.1:33042 8.1.1.2:33041 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 9416600 8.1.1.2:33041 8.1.1.1:33042 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I take it your system has higher values for the tcp_wmem value:

I tried a different test today:  3 TCP connections between two
wifi station interfaces (using ath9k).  Each connection is
endpoint configured to send 100Mbps of traffic to the peer.

With a single connection, it does OK (maybe 250ms round-trip time max).
With 3 of them running, round-trip user-space to user-space latency
often goes above 3 seconds.

I had set tcp_wmem smaller for this test, and I verified that
the socket SND/RCV buffer setsockopt was not being called.

[root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# netstat -an|grep tcp|grep 33
tcp        0      0 12.12.12.4:33040            0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN
tcp        0      0 12.12.12.4:33042            0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN
tcp        0      0 12.12.12.4:33044            0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN
tcp        0 556072 12.12.12.4:33040            12.12.12.3:33039            ESTABLISHED
tcp        0 274916 12.12.12.3:33043            12.12.12.4:33044            ESTABLISHED
tcp        0      0 192.168.100.138:33738       192.168.100.3:2049          ESTABLISHED
tcp        0 205156 12.12.12.4:33042            12.12.12.3:33041            ESTABLISHED
tcp        0 217184 12.12.12.3:33041            12.12.12.4:33042            ESTABLISHED
tcp        0 436552 12.12.12.3:33039            12.12.12.4:33040            ESTABLISHED
tcp        0 288820 12.12.12.4:33044            12.12.12.3:33043            ESTABLISHED

[root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
4096	16384	4000000

This is 2.6.39-wl+ kernel.

So, seems a general issue with over-driving links with multiple TCP connections.
Doesn't seem like a regression, and probably not really a bug, but maybe the
buffer-bloat project will help this sort of thing...

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-20 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-19 22:47 TCP funny-ness when over-driving a 1Gbps link Ben Greear
2011-05-19 23:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-19 23:20   ` Ben Greear
2011-05-19 23:42     ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20  0:05       ` Rick Jones
2011-05-20  0:12         ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20  0:24           ` Rick Jones
2011-05-20  0:37             ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20  0:46               ` Rick Jones
2011-05-20  3:39                 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20 21:33                   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-05-26 15:28                     ` TCP funny-ness when over-driving a 1Gbps link (and wifi) Chris Friesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD6DE1C.8090607@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.