From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: rick.jones2@hp.com
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP funny-ness when over-driving a 1Gbps link (and wifi)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:33:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD6DE1C.8090607@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD5E270.3030209@candelatech.com>
On 05/19/2011 08:39 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 05:46 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 17:37 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 05/19/2011 05:24 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> [root@i7-965-1 igb]# netstat -an|grep tcp|grep 8.1.1
>>>>>>> tcp 0 0 8.1.1.1:33038 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>>>>>> tcp 0 0 8.1.1.1:33040 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>>>>>> tcp 0 0 8.1.1.1:33042 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
>>>>>>> tcp 0 9328612 8.1.1.2:33039 8.1.1.1:33040 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 17083176 8.1.1.1:33038 8.1.1.2:33037 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 9437340 8.1.1.2:33037 8.1.1.1:33038 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 17024620 8.1.1.1:33040 8.1.1.2:33039 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 19557040 8.1.1.1:33042 8.1.1.2:33041 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>> tcp 0 9416600 8.1.1.2:33041 8.1.1.1:33042 ESTABLISHED
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I take it your system has higher values for the tcp_wmem value:
I tried a different test today: 3 TCP connections between two
wifi station interfaces (using ath9k). Each connection is
endpoint configured to send 100Mbps of traffic to the peer.
With a single connection, it does OK (maybe 250ms round-trip time max).
With 3 of them running, round-trip user-space to user-space latency
often goes above 3 seconds.
I had set tcp_wmem smaller for this test, and I verified that
the socket SND/RCV buffer setsockopt was not being called.
[root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# netstat -an|grep tcp|grep 33
tcp 0 0 12.12.12.4:33040 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 12.12.12.4:33042 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 12.12.12.4:33044 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 556072 12.12.12.4:33040 12.12.12.3:33039 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 274916 12.12.12.3:33043 12.12.12.4:33044 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 192.168.100.138:33738 192.168.100.3:2049 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 205156 12.12.12.4:33042 12.12.12.3:33041 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 217184 12.12.12.3:33041 12.12.12.4:33042 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 436552 12.12.12.3:33039 12.12.12.4:33040 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 288820 12.12.12.4:33044 12.12.12.3:33043 ESTABLISHED
[root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
4096 16384 4000000
This is 2.6.39-wl+ kernel.
So, seems a general issue with over-driving links with multiple TCP connections.
Doesn't seem like a regression, and probably not really a bug, but maybe the
buffer-bloat project will help this sort of thing...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-19 22:47 TCP funny-ness when over-driving a 1Gbps link Ben Greear
2011-05-19 23:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-19 23:20 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-19 23:42 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20 0:05 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-20 0:12 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20 0:24 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-20 0:37 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20 0:46 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-20 3:39 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-20 21:33 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2011-05-26 15:28 ` TCP funny-ness when over-driving a 1Gbps link (and wifi) Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DD6DE1C.8090607@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.